November 18, 2004
A Ramble: Evil Times
Are you a chatter? Do you tend to chat with strangers? Invite, from time to time, conversation with people you don't otherwise know but with whom you are sharing some common experience, be it waiting for a late train or stuck on line at the bank? I am mostly that kind of person. My wife is not, probably. I think she is little bit shy while I am not. This may explain why I have a blog and she does not. I think that this is a trait shared by most bloggers.
Yesterday, I had a chat with another lawyer. He wanted an extension of time, his second, so that he could move to dismiss my complaint against his client. I was basically agreeable to extending his time but insisted, to his great surprise, that he take a longer time than he had asked for. I explained that his date would inevitably involve him working over Thanksgiving weekend and that this particular fight, just being about money, is not worth it. I insisted he take a later date. After that, we got to chatting and I learned that both of his parents had been at Aushwitz. Both. Parents. His mother and his father were concentration camp survivors.
I was floored. I have met camp survivors before, but not many of them. I have been on a tour of a concentration camp before, a topic, if anyone is interested, for another post. You see these people, these survivors and you know you are in the presense of something extraordinary. These people did not survive some stupid television show. They survived evil.
Parenthetical: Evil is a concept that has fallen out of favor since, for the multiculturalists and relativists, it requires taking a firm comparative stand and making a value judgment. I am comfortable doing that and saying that certain cultural practices are not just different, they are flat out evil or wrong. Clipping off a baby girl's clitoris is just flat out wrong. Exterminating the Jews of Europe or engaging in genocide in Rawanda is evil. Stalin? Evil. These are not hard judgement calls to make. Don't shirk from making them just because others say you cannot sit in judgment on other people and their specific cultural practices. You are a human being and thus, you can. Endof Paranthetical.
These survivors looked evil in the face and, by luck or grace of God or pure strengh of will, or a combination of all of the foregoing, walked away. This attorney's parents walked away, found love, and made a family. They left the camps and made two sons, one a lawyer and one a diplomat. They made a success in this country. I am awed by people like this. I don't know, and hope never, ever, to have to find out, if I have the inner fortitude that these people had to survive.
His parents bear tattoos of their death camp numbers on their arms. They can never forget. So long as they live, we can never forget.
Evil still walks the earth. It paused in Beslan, a name I do not have to look up to check the spelling on. It lingers in Israel with the death of every Jewish child shot while hiding under the beds by brave Islamic terrorists who regard each death as a brave act, worthy of great celebration in the streets of Palestine. Can you doubt, really, that this is evil? I cannot. And I despair. I despair as the world press lionizes the life of Arafat, the world's oldest terrorist, without taking note of his crimes against humanity. I worry that it has become safe to hate Jews. Again. This is an ever present thought in my mind. It lingers in the background. It comes to the fore sometimes when I look at my children and wonder, did I do them any favors by converting them to Judaism? Have I just painted targets on their backs? This is an intensely and deeply held fear. I don't have an answer to this question and I hope I never do.
This was a major ramble today and I would never have gone down this path if I had not stopped to chat with this other attorney. I would never have learned about his parents if I was not a chatter and I would have missed the opportunity to reflect on it. I'm glad I took a moment to chat with him. You never know what comes out of a random chat.
Disclaimer: As with all of my rambles, this is stream of consciousness and I have not and will not re-read to edit. You take it as it comes with these. Also, this does not constitute an offer to buy or sell securities. Finally, smoking is probably bad for you.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
11:07 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 811 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Not that this is the most important thing to take out of your post but your throwaway at the end tickled me. We recently had visitors from The Netherlands and their cigarette packs had warnings far more straightforward than the ones we have. One was "Smoking will kill you" another was "If you smoke you will die". Very straight-forward and to the point.
Posted by: Jim at November 18, 2004 11:33 AM (tyQ8y)
2
Just thought of something with that second cig warning. Aren't you going to die regardless of your smoking habits? I mean they're saying that if you don't smoke you will be immortal, right?
Okay, my sidebar is finished. Great post, RP!
Posted by: Jim at November 18, 2004 11:35 AM (tyQ8y)
3
Wonderful post, Random. As usual.
I visited Dachau in the '80s. Walking through there gave me a sense of absolute tragedy. When you see firsthand the accomodations, the chambers, the ovens...nothing I've ever experienced has moved me as much. You realize then that no matter how much you read about it, how many movies you see, there is no way of imagining what an awesomely atrocious existence was had there.
It's disheartening to see that genocide is still alive and well. Humans are infamous for neglecting to learn the lessons our history strives to teach us.
I hope kinder, saner minds prevail. The world has much at stake in the outcome.
My hat goes off and my heart goes out to all concentration camp survivors, as well as to those that did not make it. No person should have to suffer such an awful fate.
Posted by: Mick at November 18, 2004 12:32 PM (VhRca)
4
That was a lovely and thoughtful comment, Mick, as usual.
Jim, I'm glad that the humorous aspects of my disclaimer tickled you.
Posted by: rp at November 18, 2004 12:37 PM (LlPKh)
5
I've seen the movies about the concentration camps, and every time I had a hard time watching them, the sheer horror of every moment that was lived once they were arrested. I usually broke down if watching by myself, very similarly I broke down when watching the footage after the initial attacks on Baghdad watching Fahrenheit 911. "Lest we forget" is the motto for Canada's Rememberance Day on Nov. 11. Unfortunately a large portion of the world HAS forgotten, or chosen to ignore the lessons learned by the World wars. Evil is alive and thriving in our greedy societies and will continue as long as we view the worth of human life as less than the wealth we accumulate.
I used to write songs when I was in high school, mostly just lyrics. Here are some that seem apt:
"You've been given the gold, but can you keep it?
Will your bones never wither away?
All the things you acquire and the money you gain
will never be enough to open the gate."
Ok, so it was grade 11, I wasn't a wordsmith
Posted by: Oorgo at November 18, 2004 01:09 PM (lM0qs)
6
When Dan and I first got together, we had many discussions about "evil". Dan believes in evil, but I did not. I argued that anything "evil" can be explained as sick, twisted choices made by human beings who become flawed in their thinking, not because somehow "evil" got inside them. But Dan argued that there *is* evil. That people can tap into evil the same way we can tap into good. For strength. For inspiration. He says it's a choice.
Still, calling something "evil" seems to me to be acknowledging that Evil is a force unto itself. As is Good. And I don't know if I buy that. On the other hand, there are many forces in the world I can't see or point at. Love, for instance. It exists, but I can't offer you proof. So...dunno. Thoughtful post, though, Random!
And isn't that just like you to have been so thoughtful about the other lawyer traveling over Thanksgiving? :-) *beams at Random*
Posted by: Amber at November 18, 2004 01:38 PM (zQE5D)
7
a very moving, and personal post. thank you for sharing it.
i didn't think you needed the disclaimer
and for the statement
So long as they live, we can never forget.
we can never forget...rp...never.
Posted by: standing naked at November 18, 2004 07:07 PM (IAJcf)
8
Random,
Re: chattiness as a trait shared by most bloggers - not true in my case. In my marriage, my wife is the one most likely to chat up total strangers, but she doesn't blog. I'm more shy and awkward with people I don't know but I blog.
Nice comments on evil. I have much more to say on the topic, but need to get my thoughts and words better organized.
Posted by: JohnL at November 18, 2004 11:25 PM (gplif)
9
I am not a chatter. And I too once toured a concentration camp-Terezin, in the Czech Republic.
Going to places like that makes you hate God and rage at the world.
As a side to Jim-all the cigarette packets in Europe say that, in bold letters, across one whole side of the ciggies. It amuses me, and doesn't seem to work.
Posted by: Helen at November 19, 2004 02:13 AM (AeGVs)
10
My 1.65 cents-worth (adjusted for inflation):
I'm a chatter. My mother said I would talk to a telephone pole. *eyeroll* People are INNNN-terestin'.
*guilelessly* You give good dictation. I know this by the PARENTHETICAL/ENDPARENTHETICAL.
Maybe, instead of painting a target on their back, you've given them a heritage of strength and fortitude, courage and bravery. (Yeah, I'm pretty much a "glass half-full" type, why do you ask?)
It's not so much the smoke as it is the resultant fire that is really deadly. I smoke. And I wish I didn't. But what I wish MORE, is that "interested bystanders" would STFU and let me enjoy my damned cigarette. As I told one particularly pushy gentleman who informed me "Smoking those will kill you": "Yeah, but my NOT smoking right now MIGHT kill YOU."
Keep on with the random posts. I love your musings.
As always,
Posted by: Margi at November 19, 2004 04:25 AM (MAdsZ)
11
Nice one, RP.
For the record, I am a chatterer's chatterer. I'll talk to almost anybody, anywhere, anytime.
Posted by: Howard at November 19, 2004 10:39 AM (e1Imk)
12
Well, this post certainly received some very interesting and thoughtful comments and I appreciated them all.
I don't really know where to start addressing them. So, I will merely address one remark: Helen, you and I visited the same camp, the Children's Camp, it was called. If that isn't enough to make someone want to cry, that children were removed from their parents and sent off to another camp entirely, then I just don't know what to say. It is proof positive of Evil.
Posted by: RP at November 19, 2004 03:19 PM (LlPKh)
13
I did tour the children's camp. I also toured the political prisoner adult's camp.
It was the children's camp that gutted me and tortured my dreams for ages.
Posted by: Helen at November 20, 2004 03:27 AM (AeGVs)
14
Wonderful post.
I too am a compulsive chatterer with strangers. I love finding the common and not so common groud.
And you are right about evil. It doesn't help to equivocate. It does help to point it out and demand its end. Evil begets evil. We do the world no favor when we conflate understanding the cause so to prevent it in the future, with forgiving and allowing its existence.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at November 20, 2004 03:39 PM (iT4Tl)
15
Helen, you know exactly where I am coming from.
Thank you, Rachel Ann. You and I are on the exact same page and probaly at the same sentence on that page.
Posted by: RP at November 21, 2004 10:52 AM (LlPKh)
16
*cough* (non-smoker cough) A little late here, but that is a great post, especially the aside about evil.
Posted by: Simon at November 22, 2004 03:32 AM (OyeEA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 15, 2004
The Empty Suit
I walked away from buying a new suit today. It was a lovely suit, dark blue with pin stripes, double vented in the back and it fit me splendidly. It was a Cerruti suit, reduced from $1,600 to $495. Quite a reduction but the store lost its lease and is closing. I was all set to buy it and it was going to be the first new suit I have bought in several years. I've lost quite a bit of weight lately and was thinking it might be time to make an addition to the wardrobe. I was very excited about it. Then I noticed that the suit was made of 92% wool and 8% polyester. $495 for a suit that was not pure wool? Are they serious? I flatly refused to buy it at that point. They tried to explain that these suits sold very well and that the 8% was used to keep the suit from wrinkling. So what? Polyester does not breathe that well and even 8% was too much for me. Am I too fussy? Maybe. I am certainly particular and I made the mistake once before not paying close enough attention to the fabric of a jacket. That was a good mistake since I now pay better attention.
This was just the suit that got away.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
02:04 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 227 words, total size 1 kb.
1
If I could afford it I would get the 100% as well, though I prefer 100% cotton or silk to wool. Wool is too itchy. But quality lasts and lasts and lasts.
A well tailored suit stays around in the closet till it goes of style and comes back again.
I don't understand about the wrinkling part; I suppose if one commonly throws one's clothes on the floor that would be true, but if one is paying $1,600 for the suit (which is what it was expected to sell for) I would think one would take better care of the item.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at November 15, 2004 03:38 PM (K4EpJ)
2
Sheesh, I think if you loved the suit so much, then you should have moved past the 8% poly. You probably wouldn't have noticed - my guess is it's just enough for the suit not to wrinkle as easily, but not enough for the fabric's breathability to be compromised. Poly's come a long way since the 70's, you know...
Posted by: GrammarQueen at November 15, 2004 04:43 PM (gDEwS)
3
Actually, I thought I could feel it when I ran my hand over the lapel (which I was doing to see if I could feel whether it was top fused or hand sown since they feel different and this was the first Cerruti suit I ever looked at). It just didn't feel correct to me, the fabric. That's why I looked at the label so carefully. It had not occured to me that the suit could be anything other than wool until I felt it more carefully.
Posted by: RP at November 15, 2004 04:52 PM (LlPKh)
4
Polyester is evil.
Good Choice
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at November 15, 2004 06:47 PM (U3CvV)
5
well, not sure about evil
but
good eye RP...
Posted by: standing naked at November 15, 2004 08:54 PM (IAJcf)
6
Hey man, you're absolutely right. I no longer bother buying any kind of clothing that I don't feel 100% comfortable with. It's just not worth it. You'll hesitate before grabbing it every time you see it hanging in your closet.
Good eye!
Posted by: Mick at November 15, 2004 09:23 PM (QLESm)
7
Er. Uh.
I don't get it. What's the difference?
Posted by: indigo at November 15, 2004 10:23 PM (5PkrR)
8
I sort of have to agree with Indigo. I mean, lovely suit? Cerruti? Big reduction? As a woman, I get subjected to clothing horrors all the time-thongs, high heels, waxing. To me, an 8% difference wouldn't have made any difference at all.
BUT-the good news is, you know what you like and what you're comfortable in.
*shakes head over loss of Cerruti suit*
Posted by: Helen at November 16, 2004 02:44 AM (AeGVs)
9
Well, the suit was lovely
looking, but not nice feeling. It has to feel nice and I could, with my thumb and index finger, detect that there was something off with this fabric. I don't care for polyester and would not expect it in a suit that claimed to be of such a high caliber. As for horrors, I think women suffer more bad clothes then men do. In fact, above, all the men agree with me and the women are less inclined to agree. I think you are just trained to suffer more than men are (clothes wise)!

Is Cerruti a big deal, Helen? I'm just not familiar with Italian suits.
Posted by: RP at November 16, 2004 05:43 AM (X3Lfs)
10
I think you should have bought it, if for no other reason than "Shopper's Remorse". I still yearn for clothing I didn't buy. The beautiful Italian jacket that was on sale that I didn't buy.
Those gorgeous shoes I didn't buy. That beautiful blouse I didn't buy back in '93.
I think many women remember the clothing purchases we *didn't* make and we forever mourn their loss.
So perhaps we women are looking at it as "Random's Suit That Got Away". You'll be talking about it wistfully years from now..."Remember that suit I didn't buy, hon? Yeah...I still dream about it at night sometimes."
Like we do. ;-)
Posted by: Amber at November 16, 2004 11:40 AM (zQE5D)
11
Not a chance, Amber, not with this one. This time I feel like I narrowly missed making a mistake.
Although I certainly understand that remorse thing. I've had that before. But usually, the remorse would come from hurrying into buying something. To borrow from a quote, buy in haste, repent at leisure.
Posted by: RP at November 16, 2004 12:01 PM (LlPKh)
12
I'm sitting here, bemused smile on my face, because I absolutely LOVELOVELOVE and did I mention LOVE the fact that you, as a man, are comfortable enough to discuss the cut, fit and composition of an article of clothing you place on your body?
Do you know how friggin' GAWJUSS that is?
You, sir, are DA. MAN.
Good call, BTW. If you ain't gonna be happy with it, it just doesn't matter if it was hand-sewn by virgins and annointed by Gawd -- it's not something you should do. I, of course, have never been that smart -- I purchase in haste and repent at my leisure.
But that has got to be the best post I've seen today.
Bless you.
xoxo
Posted by: Margi at November 17, 2004 04:19 AM (MAdsZ)
13
Oh, and I didn't read the comments until AFTER I posted.
Purchase in haste, repent at leisure. Imagine that.
::: wanders off, shaking her head :::
Posted by: Margi at November 17, 2004 04:24 AM (MAdsZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 12, 2004
What College means . . .
As some you may know, I am the Interview Chair for the Alumni Admissions group of my north-eastern liberal arts university. As such, I supervise the assignment of interviews, conduct some myself, and basically make sure that the several hundred or more applicants from NYC get interviews if they want them. In this capacity, I am forced to reflect on the position that College has in the American iconographic landscape. I am not going to post about that here. No, instead, I refer you to John's essays about
Dartmouth. Fabulous stuff, as you'd expect from John. An example from an off hand remark about admission:
[N]ot to mention the cost of the adolescence spent in gamesmanship, artful maneuver, and self-denial that led to admission in the first place.
Isn't that just brilliant?
Also, I learned a new word from his post: synecdoche. Defined as follows at Dictionary.com:
syn·ec·do·che: n. A figure of speech in which a part is used for the whole (as hand for sailor), the whole for a part (as the law for police officer), the specific for the general (as cutthroat for assassin), the general for the specific (as thief for pickpocket), or the material for the thing made from it (as steel for sword).
[Middle English synodoches, from Medieval Latin synodoche, alteration of Latin synecdoch, from Greek sunekdokh, from sunekdekhesthai, to take on a share of : sun-, syn- + ekdekhesthai, to understand (ek-, out of; see eghs in Indo-European Roots + dekhesthai, to take; see dek- in Indo-European Roots).]
I love learning new words. Thanks, John!
Posted by: Random Penseur at
02:08 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 227 words, total size 2 kb.
November 11, 2004
The Anti-Rant
I've seen a lot of rants recently. A lot of people are seriously pissed off and are venting on their blogs. Fair enough. Vent away. If it is entertaining and well written, I will read it. However, it can be tiresome. Anger is fatiguing, after all. And so I give you the anti-rant. A random list of things for which I am grateful if not downright happy.
My Anti-Rant:
I am grateful that the recent presidential election, despite the bitterness with which it was conducted, did not descend into a pit of acrimonious litigation which might have torn the Republic apart.
I am thankful that my family is healthy.
I am grateful, enormously, for every little kiss and I love you my daughter gives to me.
I am also equally grateful every time my 20 month old son calls, "Ba Ba" and holds his arms up to me.
I am grateful for the smell of Johnson's baby shampoo on the hair of children.
I am thankful we have enough money to not worry about putting food on the table or clothing the children. The rest is details.
I am happy that my wife, my childhood sweetheart, loves me and trusts me and, I think, would pack up the family and move with me almost anywhere I wanted to go.
I am grateful that my grandfather just celebrated his 90th birthday and is in excellent health.
I am grateful for the sacrifices made by men and women in uniform.
I am thankful that I live in the United States of America and that my ancestors sought it out as a beacon of hope and the land of opportunity and better things for their children.
I am happy that winter is almost upon us. It is glorious to walk to the train in the morning as the cold cuts through you and makes you feel clean and alive.
I have a lot to be grateful for, thankful for, and happy about. This list is woefully incomplete, but it is a start.
I hope you all can write a similar list, too.
Here endeth the anti-rant.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
11:28 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 357 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: JohnL at November 11, 2004 03:28 PM (YVul2)
Posted by: RP at November 11, 2004 03:31 PM (LlPKh)
3
That was refreshing! Thanks Random! :-)
Posted by: Amber at November 11, 2004 08:26 PM (zQE5D)
4
You forgot to ask for it, but AMEN!
Posted by: Simon at November 12, 2004 12:54 AM (UKqGy)
5
You're right, of course, Simon. Can I get an Amen, brothers and sisters?!?
Thanks, Amber.
Posted by: RP at November 12, 2004 07:18 AM (LlPKh)
6
I'm thankful there are still people out there like Random who appreciate little things and try to keep things level-headed.
Thanks Random.
Posted by: Oorgo at November 12, 2004 11:28 AM (lM0qs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 10, 2004
Stupid Celebrity Quote of the Day
From the
NY Post today:
Ethan Hawke satirized New York's over- demanding parents Monday when he out lined his plans for Maya, 6, his daughter with Uma Thurman. "I've already started compiling her reading list," the sometime novelist told the audience at the Glamour Women of the Year awards at the Ameri can Museum of Natural History. "It starts with the Hans Christian Andersen in the original Dutch (emphasis added), because that's important. Then there's Homer and she'll go straight into the complete collected works of Judy Blume, because as any man knows, there's no better guide to the teen woman than 'Deenie.' "
Dutch, you nincompoop? Dutch? Try Danish. Hans Christian Andersen wrote in Danish. You know, Ethan, Danish is not just something you eat with your coffee.
On that note, I leave you with the statue of the Little Mermaid from Copenhagen (you know, in Denmark?):
Posted by: Random Penseur at
01:52 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 160 words, total size 1 kb.
1
RP,
The word that comes to mind on viewing that statue is 'sublime.'
Meantime,
this story I cannot read without becoming a tub of mush.
This video produces a similar effect, and also is recommended. Cheers, MCNS
Posted by: Mark C N Sullivan at November 10, 2004 05:51 PM (q9XsZ)
2
But I've read Homer in the original French.
Posted by: John Bruce at November 10, 2004 06:12 PM (y/2mI)
3
Dear Random, great catch!
Thanks for sharing.
A reminder that perhaps being an "over-demanding parent" may be better than being a blithely-we-go "under-demanding" one, filling kids with half-truths and wide knowledge gaps.
I hadn't realized how many I had (how much I'd forgotten) till I spent more time with people educated under asian and european systems, which require more memorization.
Posted by: emily at November 10, 2004 09:47 PM (Os0C5)
4
lol....oh yeah...very nice...
(though it does sound like something i would do...lol...)
Posted by: standing naked at November 11, 2004 07:10 AM (IAJcf)
5
Confusing Dutch with Danish! You just have to see them on paper to see the difference, to begin with!
I liked the one about Homer in French, by the way....
Posted by: Hannah at November 11, 2004 07:51 AM (zr6mn)
6
Oh, Mark, that was indeed a mush inducing story. I'd never seen it before. Thanks for the link.
John, that would be Homere, he was Molliere's third cousin, twice removed.
Emily, I actually had a post somewhere earlier about the value of memorization and I quite agree with you.
Hannah, I could not agree more.
Posted by: RP at November 11, 2004 10:40 AM (LlPKh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Babe's Bat: First Homerun
This was truly cool. Last night, I saw the bat used by Babe Ruth to hit the first home run in the new Yankee Stadium on April 18, 1923.

For baseball fans, this doesn't get much cooler. For Yankees fans, it is nice to know that he hit that home run against the Red Sox.
The bat is being auctioned off at Sotheby's. Here's a press release about the sale.
I also got to see the first Mickey Mantel major league home run ball and a very cool Ty Cobb bat. I was a little surprised that the Ty Cobb bat did not have any blood or human hair on it, considering what I've read of Mr. Cobb's temper over the years.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:02 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 132 words, total size 1 kb.
November 08, 2004
Roots
I had the weekend off for the first time in some weeks now. It was glorious. My wife asked me last night what my favorite moment was and I really didn't have one. I told her that it was made up of many small pleasures and that while none of them may have stood out as particularly worthy of an extended memory, in totality, they gave me a lot of pleasure. I did run some errands this weekend: hardware store; supermarket; back again to the hardware store; and the gas station. And I cooked. A lot. I made gallons of soup, a vat of chili, and I roasted a turkey breast. Kosher turkey breast, while more expensive, is cleary the way to go. My wife deemed it the only acceptable turkey breast she had ever eaten. I also did some neglected house things, like throwing out rotted pumpkins, etc.
I did steal a little time for myself, about 10 minutes. I went and sat by the ocean. There was no one else around and it was very windy. I tried to sit there and let the salt breeze blow some of my cobwebs out. I was sad because I realized that while I had been at work, I missed the peak of the leaf change. The glorious reds and yellows and oranges that make the trees look like they are ablaze. I got a little too cold, inappropriately dressed, and went home to play with the kids.
One errand I ran this weekend got me to thinking about the concept of roots. We are a peripatetic society, or so it seems from my perch. I've lived in a couple of different states and cities and even countries. Americans, as a group, cherish their freedom to relocate as they chase the next big opportunity from state to state, region to region. And as they do, the concept of roots becomes harder to define.
For some of us, roots can be about big things. For my wife, it means that in her ancestral city, there are a couple of streets named for her family. For others, it means that significant cultural institutions are named for their family, college buildings or libraries. Others have Mayflower roots or have joined various heraldic-type societies like the Daughters of the American Revolution. There are few people who have roots like that, I think.
No, for the majority of us, roots may mean that our families have lived in a place for many generations. And as we move, roots become the place where our children went to school and grew up. As we become more mobile, it seems to me that it roots become more and more shallow and easier to put down. They become a collections of firsts. This was the first town our child was born in, the first town I was promoted to vice president in, the first town I got involved in a political campaign. So that roots become easier to pull up when you move and easier to recreate when you stop moving. And I think it is no accident that I use children in so many of my examples. Children give us roots and a place in a community that we not feel when we were younger and had less of a permanent place in it.
It may be that as you associate roots with the first time kind of experience, or even roots that simply reflect your attachment to place that it becomes harder to accept change in the physical place. As things in the physical get torn down and rebuilt or as stores go out of business, we find it harder to accept that change. What do you mean that diner closed? It's been there forever! I dislike that kind of change, even though I understand it. For instance, the cider mill in Armonk is gone. It was part of my childhood and I looked forward to sharing that with my children.
I navigate my way around Westchester, to my wife's amusement, by disappeared landmarks. I navigate a landscape inhabited sometimes only by my memory. I superimpose my map over the real topography and who is to say which one is real? Especially when my reference points are shared by someone on the other end of the telephone and we agree on a set of directions by reference to long gone places. We share the same map. We share each other's roots, a common touchstone of experience and place. Even if that place is gone.
Maybe that's what they mean when they say you can never go home again. Maybe home has changed because your roots are gone or because the roots you take with you exist only in your mind. Beats me. I just know that I agree.
Roots are not just about places, though. They are also about people. For instance, I consciously sought them out this weekend. I demanded continuity. It was my daughter's first dentist appointment. She was such a champ. After the hygienist finished, she asked me if I wanted the dentist or his associate to perform the examination and I told her that I wanted the dentist because, with this examination, he would be treating four generations of the same family. My grandfather, my mother, me, and my daughter. She was surprised to hear that. I guess it is pretty uncommon but I liked it. It gave me a feeling of connectedness, of continuity.
Roots are also about connections, about the seamless way that people interact and cross groups. About board memberships and friendships. I guess what I'm trying to say is that roots are about networks. About knowing people who can and will help you, whether from church or temple or school or professional association or clubs. These relationships are about roots. And they are not moveable. They are place specific. They may assist you with an introduction in a new place, but they won't really do more than that.
Anyway, let me leave my extended meditation with the interaction between the Girl Child and the Dentist on Saturday.
D: How old are you?
GC: I'm 3 and three quarters.
D: [Visably amused] Is that older than three and a half?
GC: Yes.
D: And when do you turn four?
GC: On my birthday. In January. January 12.
D: [Looks at me, smiles, looks back down at her] You are so cute I could just eat you right up.
GC: Oh, no, I don't taste very good.
D: That's not what your grandmother says!
GC: [Very earnestly] Oh, she's just kidding!
Posted by: Random Penseur at
08:47 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1088 words, total size 6 kb.
1
I grew up in the same neighbourhood and same house without moving. Bought a house in the same community and raised my kids and still live in the same house. When I mention selling the house because it is too big, too old, everyone goes into a panic mode, including the grandchildren (even the neighbours). They all stamp their feet and say, "We will never, never, never allow you to sell this house." Beats me, cause they all have nice homes of their own and none even want this house. I enjoyed reading your reflections on 'roots'. Guess that's the explanation. I'm part of two generations that have stayed in the same place so long, we are literally root-bound.
Posted by: Roberta S at November 08, 2004 03:28 PM (suPLo)
2
*melts at girlchild* Awwww.... :-)
Posted by: Amber at November 08, 2004 08:06 PM (zQE5D)
3
i am so glad to hear about your weekend...
*smiles*
Posted by: standing naked at November 09, 2004 07:34 AM (IAJcf)
4
Thanks for the comments, y'all.
Posted by: RP at November 09, 2004 04:54 PM (LlPKh)
5
RP, what a lovely set of meandering musings about the nature of roots! I thoroughly enjoyed reading it. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: GrammarQueen at November 09, 2004 05:04 PM (gDEwS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 04, 2004
They pull you back in
Hi, all,
If silence is golden, this blog is bling.
Trial starts today at 2:00 in New York State Supreme Court, New York County. I have been billing 12-14 hours a day. My kids know me only as a voice on the telephone at this point.
In the midst of all this craziness, I have been invited for a job interview doing something really cool. I can't say much about it at this point other than that it is prosecutorial in nature and would involve lots of trial time. I interview just before Thanksgiving.
So, Bush, huh? I expected it. I voted for him. I did not expect my vote for Bush in NY to matter and of course it did not. As I said all along, I needed a good reason to switch Presidents in the middle of a war and John Kerry never gave me that reason. Simple as that.
Anyway, wish me luck on the trial. We've actually managed to construct a defense and, if we're right, we defeat a claim for $30 million. That. Would. Be. Sweet. Besides, I would also like to stick it to the other side who, in a short time, I've come to dislike (but that's almost always the case in litigation).
Thanks to everyone who left me happy birthday wishes. I appreciated and enjoyed all of my virtual birthday cards, I just have not had time to reply individually and I'm veyr sorry about that.
Pax tibi.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
07:46 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 256 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Best of luck, for trial today and job interview to come!
Posted by: Mandalei at November 04, 2004 09:17 AM (LcyhB)
2
Great good luck on the job. Don't worry about the blog; we'll still be around to read when you get a chance. :-)
Posted by: Amber at November 04, 2004 10:47 AM (zQE5D)
3
Best of luck RP, hope the chips fall in your favor!
Posted by: Oorgo at November 04, 2004 11:50 AM (lM0qs)
4
Good luck with that case, Random. Stick it to 'em!!!
Posted by: Mick at November 04, 2004 03:12 PM (VhRca)
5
Good luck with the trial and interview.
Posted by: Simon at November 04, 2004 11:35 PM (FUPxT)
6
Good luck, RP. Glad you popped in to let us know what was going on.
Posted by: JohnL at November 05, 2004 02:42 PM (YVul2)
7
ok - good luck too....but a bit late.
i am 100 percent with you politically.
and
you so did NOT type...
this blog is bling
did you?
lol...loved it.
Posted by: standing naked at November 06, 2004 07:45 AM (IAJcf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 01, 2004
My Master Card, non-birthday phone call
I have a friend. He is my oldest friend. We have been friends since we were 2 years old. He lives in Europe now and has for some years. He just, out of the blue, called to chat. He did not remember that it was my birthday. Again. This is the third time, at least, that I can recall him doing this. Once, he called to quiz me on 80's movie trivia because he was in Germany and no one he knew there could answer any of his questions. This year, he called just to chat and catch up.
Cost of the phone call: $10?
Time spent chatting before reminding him that its my birthday: 20 minutes
Reminding him that its my birthday during the call: Priceless.
I love these calls. I'm still smiling as I write this.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:18 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: holly at November 01, 2004 02:56 PM (Wkg+N)
2
happy birthday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
happy birthday
it needed to be said twice.
Posted by: standing naked at November 01, 2004 08:44 PM (IAJcf)
3
yes Ditto!!
Hope you had a beautiful day!!
Posted by: Indigo at November 02, 2004 03:33 AM (5PkrR)
4
I love old friendships like that. They always make my world spin faster.
And happy birthday, baby. Sorry I missed it yesterday, but here's my belated wishes for you anyway!
Posted by: Helen at November 02, 2004 05:51 AM (DCpYG)
5
Happy... Happy.... Birthday our dear Penseur!
Hope it's joyful and merry and everything nice.
May it be a new year full of sugar and spice!
Posted by: michele at November 02, 2004 01:57 PM (YK/wN)
6
How nice for you, RP, to have such a nice security-blanket friendship! Allow me to add my birthday wishes to the rest.
Posted by: grammarqueen at November 02, 2004 02:47 PM (gDEwS)
7
Happy (belated) Birthday!
Posted by: Ted at November 03, 2004 11:27 AM (blNMI)
8
A happy (belated) birthday to you R.P. I am glad your friend called; what a wonderful gift!!! (hope you got bunches of other nice gifts as well)
Posted by: Rachel Ann at November 03, 2004 04:08 PM (0uyki)
9
Happy belated birthday!
You might have figured out that I'm still catching up on my blog reading. Hehe.
Posted by: Jim at November 08, 2004 08:19 AM (tyQ8y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 29, 2004
An Update / a Ramble
Herewith a rambling, stream of consciousness, not totally filtered catching up post.
I have not written much this past week or so. I hate that. I have come to enjoy the act of writing non-legal things. I love the comments I get, pro or con, and the dialogues that result. But really, I miss the writing. Sometimes when I write, I want a cigarette. Well, not really want so much as remember times past when I would write late into the night with coffee cooling next to me and an ashtray with a burning cigarette in it on the desk. I miss that part of smoking, the part that I associate with those nights and that kind of creativity. I quit smoking some ten and a half years ago, in the days after I sat for the NY Bar Exam. I figured that would be the most stressful moment and once I got past it, I could and should quit. And so I did. Now, of course, I hate smoking. I hate being behind people on the street when they smoke and I hate bars or restaurants filled with smoke. But it is a special kind of hate because I know that I miss it, like I miss that 21 year old kid smoking "Peter Rouge" in Paris in 1988-89. Paris memories involve smoking. Damn I miss that.
I had no intention of writing about smoking, by the way, so I suppose my lead in that this would be stream of consciousness was correct. I will stop here on the smoking and the callow youth I once was. Although, I suppose it is natural to reflect back on what seemed to be simpler times and the person I once was since I am staring my birthday right in the face. Monday, in fact. Another year passed in which I once again managed to dodge the sabre toothed tiger (that's how I cheerfully think of it). But that's not quite what I intended to write about either.
No, I was going to write about: thinking. I have enough time these days to write, but not enough time to think and to organize my thoughts enough to draft a coherent paragraph with a natural and orderly progression of point to point to conclusion. That's why my posts have been so short of late. More in the nature of random observations or remarks than anything I am particularly proud of. No, the problem is I am too busy to think. This is the luxury I crave. Time to step back from the rushed and harried existence. Time to reflect on my observations, to organize them, to see if I can learn anything from them. Time to record these observations as engraved images on my brain, like a print maker makes an impression. Otherwise, the observations are fleeting and they leave with a sort of, "gosh, I have to remember this so I can write about it later" sigh, but they do leave. Like yesterday, I have a half formed impression from seeing two young woman facing each other on the subway, one playing a game boy, the other clutching a text book on international financial management. I had thoughts about the value of education and the soul destroying nature of video games, but they have not fully crystalized and may never.
I also took some time away from the office yesterday to go renew my driver licence which is set to expire on Monday. I walked guided only by a need to go South and West and a desire to keep moving, so I went where the traffic lights sent me and I ended up wandering through the West 30's, a part of town not greatly frequented by tourists. It is the heart, still, of what we in NY call the shmatta trade. The rag trade. The fashion business. Full of wholesale only clothing and all the fabric stores. It is kind of seedy and dingy and full of men pushing expensive clothing through the streets on rolling racks. Clothing you might expect to see next season in the department stores. I think that's fun. It made me want to buy a small, pocket sized digital camera for my birthday to be able to carry with me and take pictures of interesting things on the street so I can post them here. There was one old fashioned barber shop that I would have liked to take a picture of, for sure. Otherwise, renewing my licence was painless and quick. I was, to quote an English friend, gobsmacked at how easy it was. Something has changed drastically at the DMV. I distrust it but I like it.
I am going to be working all weekend, again. I suspect that this might just be the case through Thanksgiving. This is the part of my job I sometimes hate, but not really. I mean, yes, I hate that I will not be seeing my kids or my wife very much but I enjoy working hard. I think that there is a reward unto itself when you stretch your capacity and work hard. Especially if the work is interesting. That's one nice thing about practicing law, the work is usually interesting and requires me to become a quick expert on whatever my client's business is. Right now, its high stakes real estate development and the financing and construction aspects specifically.
That said, I think I grow a little weary of this professional life, weary of the conflict, weary of trying to separate the truth from the untruth. You know what? Truth is inherently malleable. It really is a matter of perception when trying to establish the truth between two competing versions of events. I used to think that truth was TRUTH -- simple and inviolate. It isn't really. There are concepts that cannot be distinguished away and their may be scientific, unarguable truths, but to say that one person swears one thing is true and the other swears the other is true and therefore one is lying is not necessarily the case. They may both be convinced they are each telling the truth. And then the fact finder, judge or jury, decides which version is more credible and thus which is the truth. This is tiring. Especially when you begin to think that your own client may have a more casual relationship with the truth than you are comfortable with. Enough said, I think. Except, perhaps, a word of caution: don't lie to your own lawyer. I hope I don't need to explain why this is a bad idea, do I? One other thing, even if I may be experiencing enough burn out with my current profession to be looking up MBA programs on the web, I am old enough to know that I should not be making any long term decisions under the over worked / under rested circumstances. I'm just thinking about other options without allowing myself to take a position I may have problems retreating from. I think that counts as wisdom and not timidity. But I may just be inclined to self-generosity here.
In the midst of all of this, I had a win yesterday. A motion I filed back in February and which was submitted to the Court in May was finally decided in October. The Court favored my clients with a 10 page decision, which is unusually long for State Court. I moved to dismiss 8 counts of a complaint and I won on 6 of them, have a good argument to renew my motion on the seventh after we serve an answer to the complaint, and know for a fact that the plaintiff cannot prove the eighth count. We'll spend a little time in discovery, which is expensive, but the big threats have been removed. My clients are thrilled. Now they just have to pay their outstanding bills which I think and hope they'll be able to do.
Well, back to work now. Here endeth the ramble. I hope you enjoyed it. And if not, that's ok, too. I am not re-reading it or editing it before posting, by the way. It is truly unfiltered.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:49 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1375 words, total size 7 kb.
1
Smoking is a harsh mistress (or mister)RP. I quit for 17 years. Quit cold turkey while I was in law school. 17 years later, on a business trip to Europe (during the break up of my marriage) while surrounded by smokers I took it up again for a year. It was as if I had never quit. All the smoking mannerisms returned almost immediately: juggling a coffee or a drink with a cigarette; lighting up in the wind; etc. Quitting the second time was much harder than the 1st. I feel deprived of the 'mannerisms' if not the nicotine.
As to career changes, no need not to think of them. This is a second career for me (12 years in the transportation biz between undergrad and law school) and have to say it was a good change. Guess the legal career was my answer to burn out . . . which is the opposite of most law trajectories. :-)
Posted by: ivan at October 29, 2004 10:10 AM (A27TY)
2
I always enjoy your ramblings, Random. Ramble away. :-)
Truth...yes. It is not absolute. Just another reason why when people insist on breaking everything down to "black and white", I want to thump them on the head with an umbrella.
It's never that simple. Probably a good thing, really. If life were that simple, things would be much more boring, I think.
Posted by: Amber at October 29, 2004 12:11 PM (zQE5D)
3
Your unfiltered ramblings are as welcome as the other kind. Different flavors of the same wonderful dish.
I know from quitting smoking.... How much that brought back.
Two of my relatives both changed careers as lawyers a couple of times. One from litigation to mediation ... and the other from corporate to family advocacy. They seemed subtle to the outsider like me,("You're still a lawyer, though, right?".
Then a few years ago I went from managing small projects as an all-purpose tool (planning, executing, writing the supporting materials, providing the training) to being a program manager, where I manage all sort of people who do each of the bits and it is my job to ensure delivery. It sounds like a progression, and it somewhat was, but my days are completely different now.
We're humans, we need change. Nuanced or blunt.

Thanks again for the thought-provoking post!
Posted by: Elizabeth at October 30, 2004 10:42 AM (ehQxN)
4
Thanks for the great comments, y'all. I'm just impressed you got this far. When I put it into WordPerfect to spell check it, it was 3 single spaced pages, which is a lot to ask people to read.
I'm sorry I don't have the time to respond as I'd like to, but please know that I've read and enjoyed all of your comments.
Posted by: RP at October 30, 2004 12:24 PM (LlPKh)
5
Penseur, what a great post.
Stream of consciousness is so much better than cadavre exquise, I think. There's a progression that often leads to unexpected places.
For your readers, it's an experience where our minds move along the same paths as yours.
Posted by: emilyohyes at October 30, 2004 12:45 PM (n4KpH)
6
I really enjoyed this post as well! Thx RP!
Posted by: indigo at November 02, 2004 03:38 AM (5PkrR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 28, 2004
Happy news update: Yay, Jim!
Jim is now joining the ranks of the previously unemployed.
HE GOT A NEW JOB!!!
Yay, Jim!
Posted by: Random Penseur at
08:28 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yay, Jim!
And, just a few hours early, a
HAPPY BIRTHDAY! to you, RP!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at October 31, 2004 06:39 PM (wA+T+)
2
Thanks RP. I meant to come here when we were emailing about the trackbacks but like so many things in this past crazy couple of weeks it got pushed clear out of the cranium.
By the way, this job kicks serious ass.
Hopefully not mine. ;-)
Posted by: Jim at November 08, 2004 08:46 AM (tyQ8y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 22, 2004
Red Sox Win, Boston Loses
All over the blog-o-sphere yesterday, you could find Red Sox fans gloating. Most of them, at the least the two I like the most (
Irish Elk and
SCSU Scholars), were doing so tastefully and amusingly and I suggest you go check out their take on the internet victory dance.
But here's the thing, the Red Sox won, and I take my hat off to them for a fantastic performance (and it really was stunningly fabulous), but Boston lost. Why? They set cars on fire and rioted. It reminds me of some old football coach who said when one of his players danced in the end zone, "try to act like you've been there before" (Bear Bryant, maybe?).
Why is it that you never see NY set on fire by sports fans?
UPDATE:
According to the NY Post, a young woman was shot in the head and killed during a clash with Boston cops. According to the article:
Moments after the Red Sox' 10-3 ALCS win early Thursday, some 80,000 delirious Boston faithful poured out from bars and clubs. Fans went out of control, burning a car, hurling bottles and clashing with riot cops, resulting in 16 injuries and eight arrests.
One cop's nose was broken by a flying bottle and officials are considering banning alcohol sales during the World Series games.
The chaos reached its fiery climax on Boylston Street, a block from Fenway, when a few hundred drunken hooligans attacked a parked Nissan Xterra that bore New York plates.
The crowd smashed its windows and set it on fire.
My condolences to her family. What a waste.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:49 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 278 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Los Angeles had a problem with this for a while, too, but LAPD suddenly realized that after any game with a potentially big impact, win or lose, they had to have extra presence on the streets. The problem then stopped.
I don't normally watch cable TV, but my wife and I were out of town a couple of weeks ago and saw a show on Animal Planet about New York's mounted officers, who are routinely deployed around Yankee Stadium under such circumstances. I would guess that only New York fully understands their use in crowd control and preventing riots, although LAPD has started up its own mounted unit within the past 10 years.
Posted by: John Bruce at October 22, 2004 10:31 AM (uXGqY)
2
There is something about a horse that makes most people just back up a little.
That said, we generally only riot in NY when someone gets shot or the lights go out. Not for sporting events.
Posted by: RP at October 22, 2004 11:42 AM (LlPKh)
3
I just don't get it. It's like reading about beings on another planet doing something completely nonsensical and alien to me.
I cannot understand the point of rioting when your team *wins*. So very odd.
Posted by: Amber at October 24, 2004 01:27 PM (zQE5D)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 19, 2004
Spiced Ham Email
I got the following email from someone who's name looked vaguely familiar and so I opened it. The subject line was simply "hey". It had a link to a website which I shall not reproduce here and above the link, the following suggestion:
"drop the hammer on the next bitch you lay it to. . ."
I have no idea what it really means, and I'm too chicken to click on the link, but it sounds so tough. Maybe the author is overcompensating for latent homosexual feelings?
Posted by: Random Penseur at
01:42 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Drop the hammer? Is that what it's called these days???
Posted by: Mick at October 19, 2004 02:51 PM (VhRca)
2
Actually, the term has a long heritage. Mike Hammer, private eye, for instance. Or why do you think they (at least allegedly) call Tom DeLay "The Hammer"?
Posted by: John Bruce at October 19, 2004 03:05 PM (DjxFm)
3
I actually kind of thought "dropping the hammer" meant to shoot someone. Do they really call DeLay the hammer?
Posted by: RP at October 19, 2004 04:16 PM (LlPKh)
4
I think this was an accusation by the Democrats during the 2002 race, to show what an unpleasant character DeLay was. They apparently took it to mean that DeLay would hammer Republicans who didn't toe the line. But if they call someone a hammer, that may not be the only connotation. I've also heard it referred to, in judicial contexts, as a groin gavel.
Posted by: John Bruce at October 19, 2004 05:59 PM (0pjxH)
5
LMAO!!! Groin gavel? Really? Where, in the history of mankind, did anyone say that with a straight face? I know some judges. . . .. ANYWAY.
And on a related and more serious note (to hopefully help younger men, everywhere): Honey, if you're trying to knock the bottom out of it, you're, a) going to get tired faster, and b) not exactly going to ensure the enjoyment of your partner. There's a time and a place for everything. Use that particular move sparingly.
[/psa]
Posted by: Margi at October 19, 2004 06:36 PM (MAdsZ)
6
Let's just say you wouldn't find the expression "groin gavel" in a law review article.
Posted by: John Bruce at October 19, 2004 07:09 PM (efJ/5)
7
I'm young and even I don't have any clue what the deuce that's supposed to mean. Maybe since I'm 20 now they stopped sending me memos on the new lingo.
Posted by: Andrew Cusack at October 19, 2004 07:37 PM (KWqwc)
8
"Drop the hammer" could easily be a euphemism for the dreaded performance problem that strikes some men on occasion (though not myself, of course - I let loose with both barrels whenever duty calls ;-)
"It was going great, I was really giving it to her but then I dropped the hammer. She said it was okay, that it happens to everybody sooner or later, but it was still pretty embarrassing."
Posted by: Jim at October 19, 2004 09:35 PM (GCA5m)
9
Maybe it's some sort of mysoginistic reference to putting women in their place "Lay it to her" maybe means slapper her around.
Of course maybe I'm reading too much into it, it could mean how to get life back in your johnson after smoking too much crack.
Posted by: Oorgo at October 20, 2004 12:32 PM (lM0qs)
10
RP,
If, in the immortal words of John Lennon, happiness is a warm gun, bang-bang, shoot-shot, then the meaning of dropping the hammer (puerile though it may be) does take on the intended meaning. Of course, in order to shoot most gun (at least older ones) the gun had to be cocked first. Of course, many men who consider themselves to be gunslingers of this sort do tend to have itchy trigger fingers, so to speak, and have been known to dischrge their firearms a bit prematurely . . . hence the expression shooting oneself in the foot. In some dueling circles it is more polite to have ones 'opponent' discharge their weapon before you discharge ones own.
Having now fulfilled my quota of mixed metaphors, inapproriate similes, etc. for the month, I now retire.
Ivan
Posted by: ivan at October 20, 2004 01:38 PM (A27TY)
11
Okay, Ivan, that had me laughing out loud.
I was reminded some time late last night of "Full Metal Jacket" you know, the Marine boot camp chant:
This is my rifle, this is my gun;
This is for shooting, this is for fun.
Sorta gives new meaning to going off half-cocked, don't it?
Okay, I'm going, now. Heh.
Posted by: Margi at October 20, 2004 03:04 PM (MAdsZ)
12
By the way RP,
good idea NOT to open any of those e-mails.
[And thank you Margi]
Posted by: ivan at October 20, 2004 04:01 PM (A27TY)
13
Hi, Penseur ~ I like your take on this! Not a "I'm so sick of spam" but guarded curiosity.
Posted by: emily at October 22, 2004 06:36 AM (aKUzN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Back at work today
Well, I was back yesterday, too, just not for more than the morning. Then I left, fell deeply asleep on the train home, woke up two stops before mine (its a gift), and went home to pick my nap back up from where I left it on the train. I was feeling so sick and so drained and tired yesterday. Today marks a marginal improvement. I am cautiously optimistic, but not much more. Which is rough, considering that I lack the motivation or power to deal with some fairly complex issues today. I know that they are complex because I read the words in the cases and I don't understand them at all. That's ok. There's no real rush. Except that I have a crucial oral argument on Thursday morning and I really have to prepare for it. Tons of reading, synthesizing and outlining to do. Oh, joy.
I see three possible outcomes on Thursday. One, she denies the motion and I work all weekend to run to the Appellate Division on Monday to humbly beg for a stay of the case pending disposition of the appeal. Two, she grants my motion and then I work all weekend to get the benefits of her decision. Three, she grants my motion and she adjourns the upcoming proceedings and I don't have to work all weekend. I, of course, am holding out hope for #3.
Many thanks to everyone who sent their kind wishes for a speedy recovery. They were a very pleasant surprise and I was touched.
I did spend much of Sunday making home made chicken soup. My wife has remarked that she likes it when I get sick because then I cook a lot. Chicken soup is really an all day thing, especially if you start from scratch. But it makes the house smell soooo good.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
12:35 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 315 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Hoping for #3, dude. Hope you're feeling better!
Posted by: Mick at October 19, 2004 02:52 PM (VhRca)
2
Thanks, Mick! You're the best!
Posted by: RP at October 19, 2004 04:16 PM (LlPKh)
3
Homemade chicken soup and a weekend off. Who could ask for anything more?
Posted by: Jim at October 19, 2004 07:58 PM (GCA5m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 15, 2004
Goodbye week (and good riddance!)
I have tried not to whine too much this week about the nasty week this has been -- work; long car trip; business trip to Philly; other deadlines, etc. I have probably failed in that. Oh, well. It's my party and I'll whine if I want to, whine if I want to, whine if I want to; you would whine to if it happened to you, du du du du, du.
Seriously, I greeted the day with sharp pains in my ears at 4:00. Not good. Suspecting ear infections, I called the doctor at 4:15 and left a message begging to be seen this morning because of the pain. Also, every time I swallowed, it felt like I was trying to take down a tennis ball. So, I had tea and read Wednesday's NY Times which was still hanging around the house and which arrived after I had already left on Wednesday. That was an interesting news day. Did you know that Frank Ghery and Snohetta are going to be designing buildings at Ground Zero? I didn't. There was also a great article on a subject I've long had an interest in: economic and political inequality and disparity in China where, once again, the peasants are getting the shaft.
My wife kindly drove me over to the Doctor to be there at 8:30. On the way, I tried to reach them again by cell phone, only to be told by the officious receptionist that the Doctor couldn't possibly see me before 11:00. Not acceptable. I was kind of steamed. So, my wife pulled in, parked, and we went in to the office to suggest that maybe the Doctor could find a moment to see me now. The receptionist repeated that there was nothing she could do. I said to her, "I called you at 4:15 this morning because of the pain, it is now four hours past that and you are seriously suggesting that I patiently wait for another two and half hours?" She looked at me and said she'd go check with the Doctor. Which she did and said that the Doctor would squeeze me in. I think it is a lot easier to say no to people on the phone than in person. A lesson there for us all.
So, here I am at work, surrounded by mounds of shite I have no interest in getting through, dreaming instead of the golden hued chicken soup I intend to make this weekend, and whining on my blog.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
02:30 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 428 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Awww! Please get better really soon, mkay?
Posted by: Margi at October 15, 2004 03:15 PM (MAdsZ)
Posted by: GrammarQueen at October 15, 2004 04:47 PM (gDEwS)
Posted by: Azalea at October 15, 2004 06:59 PM (hRxUm)
4
It may be, of course, that you sounded like a ticked-off litigation attorney.
Posted by: John Bruce at October 16, 2004 11:20 AM (MRbP2)
Posted by: Mick at October 16, 2004 11:33 AM (VhRca)
6
Hope it's nothin' serious. Mmmmm, golden hued chicken soup...
Posted by: Tuning Spork at October 16, 2004 06:30 PM (u/D1a)
7
i really hope your weekend has shaped up better. and that you are feeling yourself again.
Posted by: standing naked at October 17, 2004 04:00 PM (IAJcf)
8
I thought I was the only one who'd changed the lyrics to that?

Hope all goes well for you.
Posted by: Hannah at October 18, 2004 11:48 AM (7dELN)
9
If my husband read this he would be kissing your feet. I'll tell you why. He's working the ER right now and is inundated with patients who are primary care instead of real emergencies. In some cases they have just come from their doctor's office. Had they just given it a little extra effort, as you did, they would be paying the $60 average office cost instead of the several hundred dollar ER costs.
I'm assuming it IS infection? Hope the antibiotics kick in quickly! Happy, healthy thoughts heading your way.
Posted by: Linda at October 18, 2004 01:15 PM (9Pzdi)
10
Random, you may or may not be happy to know that I'm so susceptible to the power of suggestion that now after reading your blog, the entire left side of my throat AND my left ear is killing me when I swallow in sympathy for your plight.
So I share your pain. Well, at least I think I do. For now.
;-)
GET BETTER SOON! {{{hugs}}}
Amber, the hypochrondriac
Posted by: Amber at October 18, 2004 04:28 PM (zQE5D)
11
Can't you outsource the work to some of those poor Chinese peasants? That's a win-win...
Hope you're felling better.
Posted by: Simon at October 19, 2004 02:14 AM (UKqGy)
12
Oh my. Four days. This must be a bad one!
My sympathies, indeed.

Send up a flare, kiddo. You are missed!
Posted by: Margi at October 19, 2004 05:03 AM (MAdsZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 14, 2004
Comments Replies!
Hi, all, thanks so much for all the great comments over the last week and I'm sorry if I was not as responsive as I'd like to have been. So, let me address some of the comments here, in a post:
First, thanks to all sending me good wishes on feeling better. It hasn't worked at all, of course, but I appreciate it. I think putting in a 15 hour day yesterday was not conducive to feeling better. I actually feel a lot worse. The Boy Child was not helpful in getting up crying at 2:45 this morning. I jumped out of bed to get him so as to leave my wife undisturbed since she has a job interview this morning. He just wanted to be picked up for, tops, 30 seconds. Then I put him back in his crib, at his insistence, rubbed his back for another couple of seconds, and he was back asleep. It took me a lot longer. Good thing for him that he's so cute.
Second, as for soup. Rachel Anne, you could make it with any good vegetable broth and then you don't have to skimp on the all important dairy. Phillipe, when I have a sore throat or am congested, I want as much spice as I can stand. It makes my throat feel better, oddly, and it helps me breathe. Simon, other than poaching chicken breasts, it is really hard to make a good quality home made chicken soup during the week. I'd have needed to have been home for hours for that. See, I take kosher chicken legs and simmer them with celery, carrots, onions, leeks, parsley, etc. for a long time. I remove the chicken and strain the broth, throwing out the useless vegetables. Then, I add to the broth, more aromatics (carrots, etc.) and cook them while I shred the meat from the legs. I add the meat back in at the end, et voila, chicken soup. But it ain't a weekday kind of thing to make. And I usually make a whacking big vat of it so I can freeze some.
Third, as for D.C. Next time I'm down there, I will certainly give Ivan and Wicked some advance notice and perhaps they can show me a more hospitable bar. Margi, I'm glad you liked the toast. Mick, thanks for your good wishes. Mark, thanks for the recommendation about Clyde's!
Finally, Jim, thanks for the gentle nudge. I have actually been working on another "behind the curtain" post but have not had enough time to finish it up. Maybe soon, I promise!
By the way, if your comment went unaddressed above (Amber, Helen, etc.), please know that I am not ignoring you. The commnents part of the blog is really the best part and I appreciate all of them.
Thanks again, y'all!
Posted by: Random Penseur at
10:26 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 478 words, total size 3 kb.
1
The story about the boy waking up at 2:45 is familiar, and mine is the same, he usually just wants to be held for a few minutes. Just don't make the mistake of putting him down before his time, at least my guy anyways, his cry doubles in volume and lasts much longer. Such a temper.
Posted by: Oorgo at October 15, 2004 03:48 PM (lM0qs)
2
WOW! I'll add your site to my bookmarks.
Posted by: EroComix at July 18, 2005 08:03 PM (rPEvV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Change the Rhetoric, Please
This has been bugging me for a long time and I thought I'd drop a little line about it. I am tired of the use of combat rhetoric by sports writers, athletes, and owners. So, I request here, as follows:
*Stop using the word "war" to describe a sporting event, unless the sporting event is figure skating 'cause they actually come the closest, what with the use of hit men and all;
*Stop describing men who travel with their own chefs and massage therapists as "warriors", they are not. They are paid obscene amounts of money to whack balls or put on pads and hit each other. They are NOT warriors. The closest thing to a warrior, other than a service man or woman, is (usually) the woman left at home who holds a family together under stresses you and I cannot conceive of. These woman deserve our respect. Athletes are not warriors.
*Stop using the word "battle" or "battle tested" to describe a football player. Sports Illustrated described some LSU grad as "battle tested" because he played for the Tigers. The closest he has come to battle was the co-ed who probably successfully (this is Louisiana, after all) fought him off. He may have developed great athletic ability and tremendous powers of focus and concentration, but he is not a battle tested anything. He is the most coddled of creatures, a big time college football player.
There are other examples, I'm certain, but these are the ones which come to mind and piss me off the most of late.
Here endeth this morning's rant.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:11 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 273 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'm right with you on this one, Random. These hallowed terms that once inspired awe and respect, have lost their lustre by being used and abused in sportstalk. Call a game a game, not a battle. Nobody's life hangs in the balance over a football game. At least I hope not!
Posted by: Mick at October 14, 2004 10:27 AM (VhRca)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 13, 2004
Forecast: No Blogging Today
I'm off in a couple of minutes to catch the 7:30 train to Philly where I will spend the day reviewing 30 boxes of documents. I anticipate no access to computers.
I'd rather be blogging!
Posted by: Random Penseur at
06:40 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
1
rp,
i hope you are feeling better.
and that task does not sound like all that much fun...
yes - we would also rather you be blogging.
Posted by: standing naked at October 13, 2004 09:20 PM (IAJcf)
2
Are you feeling better? Did the soup help? It sounded delicious!
Good luck with the documents
Posted by: Elizabeth at October 13, 2004 10:31 PM (sCupo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 12, 2004
Soup is Good Food
I am bad at being sick. Some people are good at it. My wife, for example, is a great sick person. She doesn't let it slow her down at all. I, on the other hand, generally will wallow in my sickitude. I am miserable. I moan. I like to be both left alone and taken care of. Mostly, I want soup. I also mostly prefer my own cooking. I am sick, right now. It is inconvenient to be sick now. I have to be in Philadelphia tomorrow and in Court later in the week. Happily, I had soup I made last week. I am going to reproduce the little recipe here both because I think others might like it and because I don't want to forget how to make it.
It was simple. I took a bag of broccoli flowerets (the pre cut up stuff you normally cook by throwing the bag in the microwave), one red pepper (I cut up), 1 hot, green chili pepper (they said it was serrano but I thought it may have been jalapeno and mis-labeled), and one really big can of low fat and low sodium chicken broth and brought it all to a boil. I added some cumin, maybe a teaspoon, some sea salt and some fresh ground pepper. I let it cook away for at least 10 minutes, which was enough time to cook the vegetables. I took it off the heat and stuck the puree wand in and zapped it. Then back on the heat for the flavors to come together. Then back off the heat for some heavy cream.
It was very yummy and the chili pepper gave it a great kick. This was a perfect weekday soup to make since, start to finish, it was a half an hour.
There are some things I might do differently, next time or if I had more time. I might have sauteed some onions and all of the vegetables first. I also might have thrown in some fresh ginger and a smashed garlic clove or two. I also might have used sour cream or yogurt instead of the heavy cream. Or even maybe buttermilk.
If I have time tonight, there will be more soup. Because we all know, soup is good food.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
11:49 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 388 words, total size 2 kb.
1
That does sound good! I would never have thought of those combos. I'll have to give it a try. Only I'll have to use parave coffee stuff..I wonder if it will work....
Posted by: Rachel Ann at October 12, 2004 12:37 PM (KKZFj)
2
How funny-I have been on a total soup kick myself. Can't get enough of it. Made a homemade leek and potato soup myself tonight.
I swear the world looks better with a bowl of soup and a glass of wine. I swear it.
Posted by: Helen at October 12, 2004 05:34 PM (/SIeu)
3
'Tis the season for soup. Although here in NorCal, our false fall has gone away and it's 90 degrees again after nice days of being cooler.
I still want soup. And my fluffy robe. *pouts stubbornly*
Hope you feel better soon, Random! I'm a lousy sickee myself. Glad you're back, loved what your grandfather said. Kudos to you and your wife for enjoying the same kind of devotion. :-)
Posted by: Amber at October 12, 2004 06:15 PM (zQE5D)
4
I love soup. Check out my recipe category for several that I've put up. Good stuff.
OT: the Jamboree is on!
Posted by: Ted at October 12, 2004 09:27 PM (ZjSa7)
5
I'm stuck between two worlds... when I have a rush at work, I don't even have a second to think that I'm sick, but then again when it's the weekend and I have nothing to do... I start my laziness processes: watching DVDs, reading Harry Potter and other non-brain-demanding-literature pieces, blogging almost non-stop, sending SMSes to everyone I know in Canada, China, Europe and the rest of the world and being miserable...
I'm sick now... can you see? I was in a rush at work and didn't realise it untiul yesterday lunch time, when I had curry beef. It killed my throat. I almost cried in the restaurant...
That's basically why I don't understand why you put a chilly pepper in there...
Posted by: Philippe Roy at October 12, 2004 10:44 PM (0wx1B)
6
What madness has descended upon you? The only soup for the sick is chicken...it's your heritage for crying out loud.
Oh the shame.
Posted by: Simon at October 13, 2004 04:45 AM (FUPxT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The weekend report
We drove to D.C., about 250 miles, with two kids under the age of four, one nanny, and six cd's. It took about 5 hours. The kids were great, no complaints and no naps.
Friday was uneventful and passed quickly, other than my discussion with the bartender, as set forth in the post before this one.
However, one amusing thing did happen. I fell into conversation with a fellow wearing a Norwegian flag on his shirt. I held a real, grown up conversation in Norwegian with someone not related to me. That was very cool. He even asked if I was Norwegian, but maybe he was just being kind. In the, “it’s a small world” category, we had mutual acquaintances. Odd.
The rest is below, in the extended entry:
more...
Posted by: Random Penseur at
10:51 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1408 words, total size 8 kb.
1
That sounds like a fabulous wonder-packed weekend! And that was a lovely toast, to be sure!!!
Hope you're feeling better!
Posted by: Mick at October 12, 2004 02:58 PM (VhRca)
2
I work within walking distance of the Hay Adams RP. Next time look me up! Sorry I missed the book festival. Had to spend the weekend in Connecticut. We probably passed each other somehwere on 95 on Sunday.
Glad you had a nice trip and participated in what sounds like a beautiful wedding.
Posted by: ivan at October 12, 2004 04:35 PM (A27TY)
3
Oh all right. The whole triumph thing just sounds trite after what your darling grandfather said.
And you made me cry. Damnit.
Well done, sir. Very well done.
Posted by: Margi at October 13, 2004 11:23 PM (MAdsZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
123kb generated in CPU 0.1947, elapsed 0.235 seconds.
77 queries taking 0.1537 seconds, 310 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.