January 02, 2007
Feels like a triumph of marketing to me, that I am more concerned, at a somewhere between conscious and unconscious level, about the image or the lifestyle or the personality associated with a car than I am about whether the car is a good piece of design and will be safe and reliable. I like to pride myself on the thought that I can make decisions rationally, that I will decide on major items based on the sensible criteria. I suppose, however, that I am not immune to questions of style and image -- no matter how wonderful the Yugo may be (and it isn't), the fact is that I will not drive one. No, the other problem is that I am woefully unqualified to judge based on first hand information how well a car is made. Cars are now way beyond the ability of a shade tree mechanic to repair and maintain. So, maybe all you have left is style and image and anecdotal information such as you get from Consumer Reports.
When I related all this to my wife, she reassured me that actually this was a failure of marketing. Marketing doesn't want you to consciously think about these questions. They want to influence you in more subtle ways, in meta ways, and if you ask the questions than marketing has failed.
Scary, when you reflect on it, how marketing shapes our decision making process at a fundemental and basic level such that the decision itself is corrupted from the get go. I mean, if the way you set the process up to make the decision is faulty, than the decision has no integrity either, does it?
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:36 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 385 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Jocelyn at January 02, 2007 05:18 PM (bwFKZ)
Posted by: Kathy at January 02, 2007 06:16 PM (+oKa7)
Posted by: Roberta S at January 03, 2007 04:02 PM (NHAyo)
62 queries taking 0.0614 seconds, 162 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








