September 22, 2004
Not in favor. I believe it is contrary to our system of government to require a vote. It is clear that sometimes a decision not to vote is a protest and is as much an expression of free speech as a decision to vote. In other words, we have the option of abstaining if we don't like either candidate and we want to send a message that a candidate may win, but that candidate lacks the popular mandate necessary to bend Congress to his or her will. That can be a powerful and important message and you send it by staying home from the polls. I think that this professor, will coming from crunchy good motives, lacks an appreciation of this aspect of our system.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
08:00 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 226 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Mick at September 22, 2004 09:35 AM (VhRca)
Posted by: Oorgo at September 22, 2004 11:02 AM (lM0qs)
Posted by: Mick at September 22, 2004 12:29 PM (VhRca)
Posted by: Margi at September 23, 2004 12:11 AM (MAdsZ)
Posted by: Simon at September 23, 2004 06:59 AM (GWTmv)
Posted by: Jim at September 23, 2004 09:45 PM (GCA5m)
63 queries taking 0.0638 seconds, 171 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








