July 30, 2004
An indictment of Journalism as a "Profession"
Thanks to
Black Five, I read the
following account by a journalist/photographer of his time in combat in Iraq with the US Marines. It is a gripping read. One thing jumped off the page at me, though:
At this time, another Marine who had rushed out to a second floor balcony moments earlier yelled, "I'm hit." One of several thousands of rounds fired in the opening 30 minutes of the battle had found its target. He gave an agonizing scream and yelled again that he was hit, hoping someone would rescue him.
Sgt. Nunez threw open the door and rushed out, returning moments later dragging Sgt. Magana across the floor by the grab handle on the back of his flak jacket. Confusion ensued. He was eventually dragged into the room where I was hunkered down. He had been shot through the back and was in severe pain.
While corpsman were concentrating on his injury, I could see that he was beginning to fade. His eyes were empty and began to close. He was mumbling about a letter from his daughter and I'm sure he began to concede that his life could end right there on the floor.
I was compelled to grab his hand and assured him that he would see his daughter once again. I looked him straight in his eye, telling him to look back at me, then squeeze my hand so I knew he was still with me. It was all I knew to do.
I felt caught between being an objective journalist and responding as a human being. I apologized to a news crew that was sharing this horror with , "I have to be a human first," I heard myself saying awkwardly. It was a lesson I had learned early on from a photo professor that had a profound effect on my life.
I shot only a few frames to depict the scene; some right as he was being dragged into the room and then some after he began to stabilize. I felt satisfied that I had both done my job and also done what was right in a potentially life and death situation.
What is wrong with a profession in which you have to feel ashamed to act like a human being? To feel ashamed when you offer comfort to a dying man who is asking about his child as he dies? When did the practice of journalism become so morally bereft and debased?
Posted by: Random Penseur at
10:26 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 424 words, total size 2 kb.
1
It's awful. I think the public's desire to have access to even the most intimate of moments during combat has forced most journalists to set themselves apart from the action, emotionally that is, and act as impartial narrators.
I do agree with the mentality that there comes a moment when you have to toss aside your so-called duties as a journalist and provide some human comfort to a soldier in need. How very base would you be otherwise?
Posted by: Mick at July 30, 2004 11:31 AM (VhRca)
2
More is the pity that "journalists" have forgotten what the milk of human kindness is. Taking advantage of another's pain or tragedy may make for great TV or radio coverage and makes the reporter/journalist look and feel like he/she is a sadist. I look at these talking "heads" and wonder if they are capable of a gentle or tender feeling or action.
Posted by: Azalea at July 30, 2004 03:23 PM (hRxUm)
3
I don't read the newspaper or watch the news becuase it all thrives on the hurt and pain of fellow humans. I can't see how you can let your profession cloud over instinct to comfort and care for someone injured. It makes me cry to hear such things.
Posted by: holly at July 30, 2004 04:28 PM (Wkg+N)
4
Like Holly, I don't watch the news anymore. I read online what I need to know so I can make informed choices. And I don't buy magazines or papers that sensationalize suffering either.
It's funny, I'm still trying to get through "Bowling for Columbine" (I got further last night than ever; a whole half hour before I turned it off), and it brought back memories of when Columbine happened. I was on a business trip with my associates and the woman I was sharing a hotel room with (remember, I was broke back then...*grin*), couldn't stop watching the TV coverage in our room. The reporters were desperate for more grief to show. They were actually going up to people, sticking a mic in their face and saying, "Did you know anyone who died? Well, how did it make you feel?"
!!!! How the *hell* do you think it made them feel, you f***ing moron?!
I was so sickened, I said, turn it off, please, we've all seen enough. It is enough to know it happened; why show it over and over and over again? She was rivited, though...like watching a car crash.
It is not the most exalted human trait we have, that.
Posted by: Amber at July 30, 2004 05:12 PM (zQE5D)
5
I don't fault the journalists-they are supposed to be bias- and interaction-free. They signed up for that gig. They knew it when they did it. I did similar, when I signed up to be an anthropologist-you have to observe, never influence.
I got out of anthropology since I can't keep my damn mouth shut.
This is their job. They know it, they signed up for it. It may suck, it may hurt, but they knew what was there when they started.
Posted by: Helen at August 01, 2004 06:32 AM (pS7+B)
6
I should also say that I don't watch tv journalism either-I am not interested in seeing destroyed lives for my entertainment. I want just the facts, I think my head is filled with enough awful images.
Posted by: Helen at August 01, 2004 06:34 AM (pS7+B)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Vertigo of Bed Time
Vertigo, according to my trusty Webster's, is a "dizzy or confused state of mind". It is also, in my house, a condition brought about by hopping in and out of bed to run back and forth between your bed, if you are 3 1/2, and your parents' room, when your parents think that you are safely ensconced in your bed and headed off to dreamland. We are experiencing a lot of bed time vertigo.
My wife and I leave our bedroom door ajar at night. Slightly more open than cracked. What happens is this, we hear a little creak of the door, and a little golden head slowly inserts itself in the opening and two little eyes come into view as they carefully peer around the edge to see if she might be welcome. Then she bops right in, sometimes interrupting a conversation not really meant for 3.5 year old ears, and announces that she just came in for an extra hug and a kiss.
Last night, I was sitting in one of the chairs we have in our bedroom and she came in, this was the second visit, and informed us of her need to give more hugs and kisses. She looked at me in my chair and said, "you know, Pappa, this would be easier if I climbed up into your lap". I told her that would be fine, got my extra hug, kiss and cuddle and sent her off to bed. Again.
The third time she came in, she said, "I heard a noise. Mamma, did you make a noise? Mamma, det er stille tid", she admonished. For you non-Norwegian speakers, she told my wife that it is quiet time. I barely managed to not laugh out loud. And off she went by herself back to bed after giving my wife a kiss.
My wife and I have a different point of view on these little excursions. My wife doesn't like them. She worries a little about the invasion of privacy, like last night when my wife and I were having a private conversation and the girl child snuck in. I don't worry about that at all. I am absolutely delighted. I love these little flying visits. They are pure joy. I propped her up on the counter during the first visit so she could keep me company while I brushed my teeth. Eventually she will go back to bed and sing herself and her animals to sleep. I treasure every second of these visits. I think it's close to the best part of parenthood so far. I explained this to my wife and she said she'd try to come around to my point of view. She's a little stressed right now but if she says she'll try, she really will try. She's good like that.
I just wonder how it is the girl child's head doesn't spin, hence the vertigo in the title, from all of her ups and downs and ins and outs.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:13 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 508 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Awww...*sigh* I remember the kids getting in bed with us when they were little. Yes, it was sometimes hard, because they kick in their sleep, you know. :-) But I felt so loved/loving when we were all in bed together. It's a lovely time you two are going through, enjoy it! :-)
Posted by: Amber at July 30, 2004 05:14 PM (zQE5D)
2
Me too. I also have a 3.5 year-old daughter.
Posted by: David Boxenhorn at August 01, 2004 04:36 AM (10Wu7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Shhh!
Don't tell anyone, but I am going to try to play half day hooky today. I'm going, if all the stars are in alignment, to slip out of my office at the noon hour and spend the afternoon with my wife in blissful, child free, irresponsibility. Hmmn, sounds like a nooner, doesn't it? Alas, no, I mean lunch and the beach and a book and an adult beverage and idle chatter and hand holding and the occasional smoochy for no reason at all. Assuming the weather cooperates, it could be glorious. Then an early dinner with some new friends.
Until I can take a real vacation, stealing a little time here and there will have to suffice.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
05:30 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That sounds like heaven. Hmmm...maybe I'll have to follow that lead...
Posted by: Jim at July 30, 2004 10:00 AM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 29, 2004
Bed time stories
Last night, I was once again put firmly in my place by the girl child.
She joined us downstairs for a snack after putting on her pj's. Actually, what she called a snack was almost as much as my wife ate for her entire dinner. I don't know where this child puts it. She is so thin that the doctor actually had her tested to see if she was absorbing nutrients. She was. She is in the 90th percentile for her age group for height and the 50th for weight. Tall and thin. I don't have any idea where that comes from. After finishing her "snack", we adjourned to the living room to watch the Yankees/Blue Jays game on mute while we had our story.
She picked two books, one in Norwegian for my wife to read and one in English for me. Mine was "Katy No Pockets", a story about a kangaroo who lacks a pocket in which she can carry her baby. I get tired of reading the same old story all the time, so, I do what any normal father does. I change the words. In Curious George, for example, the Man with the Yellow Hat becomes the Man with the Green Hat. Katy was not searching for a pocket this time, but a backpack. My daughter is way too smart for this kind of thing, though. She catches me every time. She tells me, "Pappa, read it straight, please, not funny."
Last night, though, we finished the book and she decided to make it clear to me just where I went wrong with Katy. She hopped off my lap and came around in front of me. She opened the book to the last page and pointed to the picture of Katy wearing her apron of many pockets and she said, firmly, "see, Pappa, pockets, not a backpack, pockets". She looked at me carefully, as if to make sure I understood, and then took the book back to put on the shelf. Her work completed, we went upstairs to go to bed.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
11:28 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 351 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Cute! Not much gets past them!
Posted by: Mick at July 29, 2004 11:39 AM (VhRca)
2
It's good that you've got her there to help you out like that. LOL
My tip for the constant retread book ordeal is to read two stories. You pick one and they pick one. That gets them exposed to new stuff and they tend to move off of the same book after a couple of repetitions.
Posted by: Jim at July 29, 2004 11:42 AM (IOwam)
3
LOL. I'm glad she was able to teach you the correct way to read so quickly. Some parents take at least a week!
Posted by: Rachel Ann at July 29, 2004 12:54 PM (KNicp)
4
Adorable, as always, Random. :-)
She loves you so much.
Posted by: Amber at July 29, 2004 02:40 PM (zQE5D)
5
My nephew was the exact opposite. He LOVED it when I changed a word here and there.
"Sam I am, I do not like green legs and spam"... I thought he was gonna pass out from laughing so hard.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at July 29, 2004 09:57 PM (uSX+R)
6
The poor girl; she must think her Pappa is an idiot. It's funny because my girls love it when I mix it all up - they spend countless minutes correcting me until they realise that I must be an idiot to be humoured instead. So I'm with you.
Posted by: Simon at July 30, 2004 02:53 AM (OyeEA)
7
Thanks for all the comments, y'all. Actually, with the Curious George books, she does like it when I screw up intentionally. She thinks it's funny. And then she reads it to me (because she actually knows every word on each page, just about) and then she deliberately screws it up and see what I'll do and she does it with this huge grin on her face. It's a lot of fun.
Posted by: RP at July 30, 2004 05:33 AM (X3Lfs)
8
Mixing the words up in the bedtime story was the first sign that I was about to fall asleep. I can remember one of my kids prying my eyelids open to establish eye contact and demanding that I finish the book.
Posted by: Annie at July 30, 2004 07:48 AM (a6EvO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
South Africa and AIDS
I've posted before about the impact of the AIDS virus in Africa. About how 2-3 people have to be hired to perform the same job in middle management in South African companies because chances are statistically very good that only one of them will be around to get the job done. Or maybe I haven't posted about this. I have certainly harangued my wife about it. (By the way, the poor dear deserves your sympathy entirely because before I discovered blogging, she was the sole "beneficiary" of my rants.)
There was an article in the NY Times this morning about AIDS in South Africa. Its lead in was about how graves have to be recycled in Durban because of the high number of deaths and the small amount of cemetery space. It included some shocking statistics and I want to bring them out here so that all my readers, all eleven of you (and you know who you are), can share my concern:
*51 of the 53 municipal cemeteries are officially filled to capacity
*"Five years ago, we used to have about 120 funerals a weekend, but this number has now jumped to 600," Thembinkosi Ngcobo, who heads the municipal department of parks and cemeteries, said in an interview this week. "In order to cope with the current rate of mortality - we hope it is not going to increase - we will need to have 12.1 hectares every year of new gravesites." That is nearly 30 acres.
*Roughly one in eight South Africans is H.I.V.-positive
*in Durban, South Africa's third-largest city with about 3.5 million people, a survey two years ago of women at pregnancy clinics found about 35 percent were infected with H.I.V.
This is tragic. I just never contemplated the effects of the deaths vis a vis funerals and cemetery use. I'm glad that the NY Times brought these facts out.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
08:58 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 322 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Every one of those stats is devastating. Hard to imagine how things can get so far out of hand.
Posted by: Mick at July 29, 2004 11:37 AM (VhRca)
2
Exactly, Mick, devastating.
Posted by: RP at July 30, 2004 05:33 AM (X3Lfs)
3
I have been following AIDS/HIV in Africa and the rest of the world for some time. I marvel at how callous the rest of the world seems in the midst of this mass death and destruction of an entire continent. Who is going to look after the orphans who are left behind and abandoned by their kin?? How will the these underdeveloped countries ever recover??? I wish I had some answers.
Posted by: Azalea at July 30, 2004 03:33 PM (hRxUm)
4
Darn darn darn. Shattering article.
Posted by: Anne at July 30, 2004 05:46 PM (5BRTc)
5
Did you know that when people are buried here in Holland, they're dug up and burned or something after 50 years so that the grave can be used again? I think it's also because people rot faster since it's always so damp here...
Now I remember why I want to be cremated.
Posted by: Hannah at July 31, 2004 11:06 AM (rUuGB)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 28, 2004
Behind the Curtain: Daniel Edgar Sickles
Thanks to Jim, by the way, for suggesting the titles for these short biographical sketches.
Today's sketch is of Daniel Edgar Sickles. I came across his name while looking at the Hayes/Tilden election. Sickles was, in 1876, the fellow who realized that if the disputed states could declare for the Republicans, Hayes would win the electoral college. Sickles immediately sent telegrams to the governors of those four states, signing the name of the chairman of the Republican Party, who was too drunk to do it himself. When I read about this, I began to wonder, just who was this Sickles fellow anyway? Turns out, he was a pretty colorful character himself and worth a closer look.
more...
Posted by: Random Penseur at
05:13 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 793 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Wow, what a character! A rake, ruffian, and murderer. Can you imagine such a man staying attached to the high aspects of party and politics in this day and age?
I was familiar with the name from studying Gettysburg but all the rest is new for me. You can count me among the majority who think his moving off of Cemetary Ridge was a moronic action that directly resulted in the destruction of his corp as well as the massive casualties suffered by the 2nd. Only several flukes of Yankee luck kept Longstreet from capitalizing on Sickle's foolishness.
Posted by: Jim at July 29, 2004 09:16 AM (IOwam)
2
Glad you enjoyed it! You pretty much have to read these since you gave me the name for the category. By the way, some biographers have suggested that the only reason he wasn't censured for his actions was because he lost his leg.
Posted by: RP at July 29, 2004 09:32 AM (LlPKh)
3
Man, I'd never heard of him. The guy got around though, didn't he?
Great series! Thanks!
Posted by: Mick at July 29, 2004 12:23 PM (VhRca)
4
What an eyeopener. And people say history is boring.
I am glad I never met the man (quickly checks past history lives) but it does make for some interesting reading!
Posted by: Rachel Ann at July 30, 2004 10:08 AM (KNicp)
5
Never knew the gentleman. I must of came from good stock because my maiden name was Sickles. I've been told that he was my great great grandfather. Pretty interesting man!
Posted by: vicki at March 12, 2005 01:51 PM (Una72)
6
That was awesome & it totally helped me w/ my project! Thanks!
Posted by: Betsey at April 24, 2005 08:31 PM (HoSBk)
7
Did not Sickles design Central Park and was it not Stanton who acteed as his defense lawyer. Please reply.
Posted by: Denny at July 21, 2005 07:12 AM (ywZa8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A Litigator's Letter
The following just got taken out of a letter I drafted to send to opposing counsel. I regret its deletion and publish it here:
During the course of our negotiations, I was treated to several unprovoked outbursts of hysterical screaming from you. Indeed, I was forced on several occasions to ask you to calm down. Most recently, on Monday, I had to suggest that due to your obvious overwrought emotional state, we hang up and continue our conversation when you had collected yourself. Based on the foregoing, and based on the vituperative personal attacks you made in your letter to me, I conclude that you have an anger management problem and I urge you to seek professional help.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
04:21 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 124 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It's probably better that you did remove it-I can't imagine anger management person's reaction to it, had you left it.
Posted by: Helen at July 29, 2004 03:59 AM (pS7+B)
2
I've "disincluded" similar statements myself. It does feel good to write it out though, doesn't it?
Posted by: Jim at July 29, 2004 09:03 AM (IOwam)
3
The best is what we in the trade refer to as "fuck you letters". They read something like this: Dear Sir, Fuck you. Strong letter to follow. Yours truly, etc.
Posted by: RP at July 29, 2004 09:30 AM (LlPKh)
4
My boss and I are constantly filtering letter drafts through each other, to remove any insensitive or politically incorrect statements written in a hot tempered moment.
But boy, it'd be nice to let some people have it at times!
Posted by: Mick at July 29, 2004 12:26 PM (VhRca)
5
Sounds like my best friend Carla's ex. He'd foam at the mouth when he got really angry. Eyes bulging. Just comletely insane. Seriously. A litigator too. I never saw how he acted in court, so I don't know about his professionalism there, but I do know that he would completely lose his mind outside of court when he got angry. Which is why my friend finally left his sorry ass, of course.
Posted by: Amber at July 29, 2004 02:55 PM (zQE5D)
6
Yeah, always best not to send those. You never know when it will get turned against you. My policy is to curse the guy privately and the nastier they get - the more polite and professional I am in response. First - it drives the other guy nuts cause you aren't feeding the fire they thrive on. Two, it creates a nice record in the event the correspondence gets before a judge or magistrate. Its amazing how much correspondence you can get before a court in, say, motions involving a discovery dispute. Seems to me it lets the court know who and what you're dealing with.
Ivan
Posted by: stolypin at July 30, 2004 10:01 PM (xy2ZU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
He stole the election!
Until today, if someone said that to me, I'd assume that they were talking about Bush/Gore, dismiss them as either a lunatic or a sore loser and I'd try to back slowly out of the room, keeping my hands and feet inside the vehicle at all times. Until today, I thought that this was the first time such an accusation had been levied at the presidential level and such a series of events had taken place in US history. Well, shame on me for being ignorant.
Let's jump into the history way back machine for a sec and revisit, in the extended section: The Hayes-Tilden Presidential Election of 1876.
more...
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:54 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 410 words, total size 3 kb.
The Girl Child - last night
I may have said this before, but it bears repeating. There are times when I interact with my daughter that I fear for my future. She's only 3.5 but I think sometimes she's really a 20 year old trapped in a little person's body.
Last night, she and I were sitting at the kitchen table where I was impatiently waiting for my wife to come downstairs after putting the boy child to bed. I was hungry and wanted to start dinner. The girl child was happy discovering the joys of the lotus leaf wrapped sticky rice dumpling I brought home for her yesterday from Chinatown. Finally, I turned to my daughter and asked her what was taking her mother so long to get downstairs. Here is our conversation:
GC: "Maybe she's doing something upstairs".
Me: "Yeah, but what could be taking so long?"
GC: "I don't know. I'm not upstairs. [pause] Did you think I was upstairs?"
I don't know if she was serious or being sarcastic (my wife votes for sarcastic), but either way, I feel like I'm totally screwed going forward.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
08:23 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 194 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm voting for sarcastic too. LOL
Posted by: Jim at July 28, 2004 08:42 AM (IOwam)
2
Could've been worse, babe.
She could've held up two fingers and asked you how many she was holding up, or else feel your forehead and see if you were running a temp.
She cracks me up.
Posted by: Helen at July 28, 2004 09:12 AM (TmM0X)
3
Only three and a half, huh? Heh - good luck! You better write these things down for good rehearsal dinner fodder down the line.
Posted by: Linda at July 28, 2004 11:16 AM (9Pzdi)
4
Yeesh. She's already worried about your mental state? You poor man. When she hits 13, you'd better just stop talking altogether. ;-)
Posted by: Amber at July 28, 2004 11:33 AM (zQE5D)
5
Boy, you better watch out with that one...she's not cutting you any slack!
Posted by: Mick at July 28, 2004 11:49 AM (VhRca)
6
My god, she sounds like I did when I was a wee one, the girl child is so awesome.
Posted by: holly at July 28, 2004 03:54 PM (Wkg+N)
7
Oh RP, just wait till her hormones kick in....
Posted by: Wicked H at July 28, 2004 04:42 PM (7TrL0)
Posted by: RP at July 29, 2004 09:32 AM (LlPKh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 27, 2004
Archeology today
A very cool find has been reported in Norway: a
major Viking burial mound, several actually.
The site contains two monumental burial mounds, one of which contains a large stone casket. The other one is believed to contain remnants of a Viking ship and a so-called "long house," used as communal dwellings.
A Viking ship! That is so cool. If you want to see what other Viking ships look like, this site has some pictures.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
12:23 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 79 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks for those links, Penseur. Extremely interesting!!
Posted by: Jester at July 27, 2004 11:34 PM (yS8Mo)
2
Welcome back, Jester! Glad to see you again!
Posted by: RP at July 28, 2004 08:24 AM (LlPKh)
3
There are no such things as Viking ships!!! These are long-ships or long-boats.
Posted by: Erik at January 18, 2005 04:07 AM (lnhw0)
4
Well, Erik, then I suggest that you take it up with the Norwegian Viking Ship museum: http://www.khm.uio.no/english/viking_ship_museum/index.shtml
They have no problems calling these, Viking Ships.
Posted by: RP at January 18, 2005 07:46 AM (LlPKh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bitterly Partisan
The heat's getting turned up here in July. People are growing increasingly shrill and bitter. We once discussed the existance of the "moderate" on this blog (by the way, I still can't quite get over the fact that I have a blog, that people come read it, and that people seem to enjoy it, it's just astonishing to me). I think us "moderates" are few and far between these days. This presidential campaign is so ugly already with people so polarized that I begin to despair. I get emails from friends on the right questioning every last thing about John Kerry and emails from friends on the left accusing George Bush of having committed every kind of crime known to man, all to further line someone's pockets. Basta! Enough already! Turn down the rhetorical heat, please, before most of us are driven from the political kitchen!
Here's the thing. I am a registered Republican simply because I have felt for a long time that there is no place for me and my views in the Democratic Party. That said, no candidate has ever been able to count on my vote simply because of his or her party affiliation. I tend to vote issues and positions, not (r) or (d). I suspect I'm going to vote for Bush come November, but I want the chance to reflect on it and chat about it. I want some civilized discourse. I want some adult conversation and reflection. I sound like a chick, don't I? I want romance, seduction, etc. No, what I want is for everybody to stop yelling and stop spinning.
At the end of the day, I suspect it will not matter who I vote for or who gets elected president. I expect strong disagreement on this point, but I'll take my chances. I am a believer in the theory that presidents will rise to the occasion. I believe that if there is a national emergency, our president will handle it, no matter which party he's from. I also believe that our country is internally strong enough to resist the effects of four years of bad rule. So, if the candidate I don't like gets in, I think it will probably be ok in the end.
That said, I think that there are significant problems facing us as a country and we might be better off with the Bush approach than the Kerry approach. But I'm going to wait and see a little bit and try my hardest to separate the substance from the spin. I just hope tempers cool a bit by November.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
12:13 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 437 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Sad to say, Random, but as a fellow NYer I think you are right about the value of your vote. I will also vote for Bush, but NY will almost certainly go to Kerry.
Posted by: Chandra at July 27, 2004 01:51 PM (dxWfW)
2
Having had to sit through terms with Presidents I haven't voted for and was scared to death when they won, then finding out the world didn't come to an end after all, and having sat through terms of Presidents I *did* vote for and feeling more than a little disappointed in them, I agree with you that in the long run, it probably won't make much difference.
Whenever I tend to panic too much, I turn to unbiased history books. There has always been corruption and justice and hope and fear with every administration. Ideally, we vote because of the issues the candidate stands for, then step back and hope for the best.
I'm surprised how many people don't seem to know what their candidates' stance is on the various issues. It's all over the place on the net, if they just do a quick search. Here's one site I found:
http://www.issues2000.org
Posted by: Amber at July 27, 2004 02:03 PM (zQE5D)
3
Even that service is somewhat partisan, I understand. Still, thanks for the link as I think it may be better than nothing.
Posted by: RP at July 27, 2004 02:26 PM (LlPKh)
4
Count me in on the registered-Republican yet moderate, non-straight-ticket-voting party. While the most prolific contributors on our site (the
GNC) are the more liberal voices, there are a few of us that are looking for the President to secure our votes for his second term. Part of me is embarassed that I haven't made up my mind yet--like I'm waiting for some disaster to befall either candidate--but another part of me agrees with you, RP: as much as both parties are trying to make this election about an ideology so powerful that the fate of the Union is in the balance, I can trust in the checks and balances.
I guess that may be one of my most Democratic of characteristics: faith in the government. Hmmm...maybe that donkey is on to something afterall...
Posted by: David at July 27, 2004 03:22 PM (M2Rrs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Stealing time
I stole some time out of my day today. I just reached into my employer's back pocket and plucked it right out. It was about a half an hour, but it was mine, all mine, and it was glorious. It was freedom and it was irresponsible and it had no agenda or address or anything and it was mine, all mine.
I took papers down to court this morning to file with the motion support office at the Supreme Court of the State of New York for the County of New York, (known to us lawyers as Supreme New York or simply S/NY). This courthouse borders on the surreal. No, well, it may, but what I meant to say was that it borders on Chinatown. I handed in my papers which the clerk accepted without a problem (which is always nice and never a sure thing) and headed off with no agenda to wander the streets a bit. Chinatown is congested, smelly (lots of fish markets), filled with tacky gift shops and just downright fun. Probably because of all of those things.
I walked through the park behind the courthouse and observed a beautiful tai chi class conducted to music and using swords in an intricate and very controlled ballet of movement and internal tension. I also was treated to the odd spectacle of Chinese senior citizens, looking very fit, stretching and twisting on the jungle gym. No kids, mind you, but lots of senior citizens. Their teenage grandchildren, quite a bit less fit looking, were screwing around on the basketball court.
Most of my favorite stores were still closed, so I couldn't do any serious shopping. I had decided to see if I could break some international trademark laws and buy my wife a cool knockoff bag. She's been a bit down of late and a bag never fails to cheer her up. Unfortunately, none of the knock off stores were open yet. However, our favorite bakery was open. Ever have coconut cream bread? It is so yummy, being both sweet and salty at the same time. I bought four pieces for the kids, wife and nanny. I also got two lotus leaf sticky rice packages for the kids. The girl child ought to enjoy unwrapping the package and eating the sticky goodness contained therein.
I then ducked into a little galley of a shop, it was long and no more than 7 or 8 feet wide. It was crammed to the gills with food products from: Malaysia; Thailand; Indonesia; and other exotic locales. I bought some new chili sauces and some Thai fried garlic bits and Thai fried red onions. I passed on the Thai anchovy snacks. They were pieces of anchovy fried in palm oil and seasoned with chili, salt and sugar. The owner of the store insisted that I try one out of the open container he had on the counter. He claimed that they were a great seller and good for your bones to boot. It was chewy, spicy, sweet, and tangy. In fact, it was a bit too chewy and dry for my taste. I ate one but passed on the entire package.
I tasted the anchovy snack all the way back to the subway and wondered, is that fishy taste the taste of adventure or the taste you have in your mouth that signals the return to responsibility?
Posted by: Random Penseur at
11:03 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 569 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Adventure. Totally.
I know, I get it when I travel, which is odd, since I am neither a carnivore nor a l*sbian.
(Don't be angry).
Nice that you tried to cheer your Mrs. up with a gift, that gets bonus points from all of your female readers.
Posted by: Helen at July 27, 2004 11:17 AM (pS7+B)
2
I love coconut bread! What a nice thing to bring home to your family, RP. The fact that it was bought with stolen time shouldn't faze anyone - we all steal a little time from our employers here and there...
Posted by: GrammarQueen at July 27, 2004 11:18 AM (gDEwS)
3
Steal away, I say, for enough time is stolen from us!
Besides, it sounds like the time was well spent.
Posted by: Mick at July 27, 2004 12:09 PM (VhRca)
4
Uhm, Helen, why should I be angry?
The rest of you thieves, thanks!
Posted by: RP at July 27, 2004 12:40 PM (LlPKh)
5
It must be in the weather; I blew almost all of yesterday off. I didn't go anywhere, I stayed at my desk but I didn't do jack.
Felt good. I really can't remember the last vacation I had. Seems like there's never any time. I think that's why lately I've found it hard to concentrate on my job.
Lovely day you had, Random
Posted by: Amber at July 27, 2004 02:06 PM (zQE5D)
6
Amber, it wasn't a day. It was only a half an hour. The rest of the day has, quite predictably, gone on to suck.
Posted by: RP at July 27, 2004 02:27 PM (LlPKh)
7
Oops! I thought that was your post from yesterday. I didn't scoll up to see. Sorry.
Obviously, I'm rushing about like a madwoman today since yesterday I played hooky.
Sorry the rest of your day has been sucketh; may things change for the better for you very soon. Hey, you're three hours ahead of me, so you're almost through!
I, on the other hand, still have several hours of torture to go. :-(
;-)
Posted by: Amber at July 27, 2004 04:20 PM (zQE5D)
8
Please, Amber, no apologies! You know I love you! I wish you the best re your continued torture.
Posted by: RP at July 27, 2004 04:23 PM (LlPKh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 26, 2004
Speaking of Kerry
I am highly amused by the spectacle of
Mrs. Kerry telling a reporter to "shove it", shortly after delivering a speech exhorting her fellow citizens to return civility to politics. Whatever you may think of the relative merits of Mrs. Kerry v. Mrs. Bush, Mrs. Kerry appears to be more entertaining. Watch the fun as the Kerry campaign deals with this little issue.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
10:22 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
1
LOL! Well as usual, I'm torn. I like the fact she told the reporter off, because it sounds like something I wish I could do, and honestly, when I see the way the paparazzi harangue the famous, especially the innocent, like the parents of a child who is missing, I want to tell them to shove it too.
Or worse.
However, I also believe in decorum. Yes, even from the wives of public officials. They are our leaders and I expect them to hold themselves to higher standards of behavior because of their authoritative positions.
The more power that is held, the more important it is to appear unruffled and "above it all". IMO.
But I've gotta say, I did think, "You GO, girl!" while I was reading it.
Posted by: Amber at July 26, 2004 12:50 PM (zQE5D)
2
I think it's great! It shows a lot of spunk.
But then, I also think Kerry is going to pay for that politically. Republicans love to grab every little thing they can get their hands on and blow it way out of proportion.
We'll see...
Posted by: Mick at July 26, 2004 06:40 PM (SaYL/)
3
It's too bad she also has referred to her current husband as "Mr. Heinz" in televised interviews. I know it's a slip-up people can make easily, but the things she says to the press that can be taken negatively are beginning to add up!
Posted by: Mandalei at July 27, 2004 08:01 AM (nemUU)
4
Mick: it's true that GOPers like to blow things like this out of proportion. Take for instance last week's incident of Jenna Bush's insolent tounge-sticking-outing, or Dick Cheney's "f-off" comment. Notice how Democrats recognized these as meaningless non-stories and didn't give them any press at all.
Posted by: David at July 27, 2004 03:29 PM (M2Rrs)
5
Amazing! This is really a perception provoking write up for the articles writers. Have never thought by doing so before! I seriously appreciate a person for submitting such a nice and useful submit. Thanks.
Posted by: rc at January 06, 2013 12:55 PM (0d2Zv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Who's got my mojo?
I feel mojo-less this morning, bereft of topics, out of ideas. I blame the tiredness from the 3 a.m. wakeup call from my wife's new pedometer that she just put the batteries into yesterday. It has an alarm function. It went off at 3:04 a.m. The children gave us a problem free night but the wife's new toy jumped at the chance to fill in.
Yesterday was actually pretty nice. We took the kids in the morning to a farm in Stamford with a great playground to burn off energy on after looking at all the different animals. The boy child appeared unmoved by the animals while the girl child was mostly struck by the smell. She also liked the "baby pigs" the best.
We brought them home for lunch and packed them off for naps. I got a little writing done while they tried to go to sleep. The boy child cooperated. The girl child refused. No nap for her. My wife was exhausted, though, and I thought she really needed a little peace and quiet. So at the risk of being seen to reward bad behavior, I put the girl child into her swim suit and took her down to the kiddy pool.
She flung herself about in the pool for about an hour. The lips turned blue and the teeth started to chatter at about the 30 minute mark. She insisted she was fine up until the hour passed and then she consented to get out and be wrapped in a towel. We then went and got a drink and her some gold fish and sat companionably by the ocean and chatted about the sailboats out on the Sound. It was delightful.
Even more delightful, she rewarded us by going to sleep early and immediately so as to give my wife and I a little grown up alone time as the Yankees got spanked by the Red Sox.
Am I the only one who watched the game and found the pictures of John Kerry mugging for the camera to be distasteful?
Posted by: Random Penseur at
10:12 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 352 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I find all pictures of Kerry as rather distasteful. Good thing I won't have to look at him while I'm standing in the voting booth.
I don't like looking at Bush even more, though... so...*sighs*. I'm rather stuck here.
This is so not my favorite election year. By far.
/depressed by the whole thing
Did the Yankee's enjoy their spanking? ;-)
Posted by: Amber at July 26, 2004 12:54 PM (zQE5D)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 25, 2004
Socialist Worker Paradise
Norway is the
socialist worker paradise, paid for by the oil resources. This was just fascinating to me -- the Norwegian worker,
excluding vacations, misses
4.8 weeks of work a year. That is stunning. It is said that it costs the government some $12 billion a year to cover the costs. Oh, and by the way, some 50% of the work force is working for the government in some capacity or another. How is this healthy for any society, that no one works and that half your work force is engaged in providing monopolistic social services to the other half? Who produces anything? How do you expect a society to grow, to thrive, to create, to do anything at all?
You cannot, in my view. The problem the Norwegians are now facing, according to the article, is that they are finally being called on this problem as American (you know, the great Satans) are buying or merging with Norwegian companies and not putting up with these practices.
Norwegian intellectuals do not like America or Americans. They are not alone in Europe, of course. But go, if you have a moment, and check out this article by Bjorn Staerk (Bear Strong for you non-Norsk speakers) on the famed Norwegian intellectual who thinks pro-American Norwegians should be put under surveillance and eventually on trial for their crime of supporting America. Truly shocking. I wonder why we bother to have relations at all sometimes with Norway.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
01:47 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 249 words, total size 2 kb.
1
WHy America bothers? Cause of the oil, baby! Norway is the richest country in the world, and weirdly enough, they save most of the money for future generations, which I always found ironic, seeing as the current generation there could use more funding.
Posted by: Helen at July 26, 2004 03:56 AM (pS7+B)
2
Well, we are by far one of the smaller importers of oil for Norway. According the their Foreign Ministry, Europe takes over 60% and the US about 6%. Norway doesn't make it into our top ten list of oil exporters and barely makes it into the top 15. I'm not sure how you define "richest" country, but I always thought that was Oman or one of the other really small Middle Eastern states. Finally, the oil fund they use to save is not entirely used to save for future generations, I believe some of it is currently spent on government projects. Moreover, I understand that the fund distorts the Norwegian stock market and causes all sorts of investment problems. That said, I think it's great that they are saving. I just wish they'd back away from some of the overt anti-Americanism.
Posted by: RP at July 26, 2004 06:29 AM (X3Lfs)
3
I dunno-I have met many Norwegians (living next door to Norway for 4 and a half years helped!) and I found them to be anti-anyone-except-Norwegians. I am not having a go against them, I have no problem with Norwegians, I think that they like being a bit of an insular community (not part of the EU, their independance day is the day they kicked the Swedes out) and just keep to themselves.
Posted by: Helen at July 26, 2004 10:44 AM (pS7+B)
4
Look, they've got oil so they'll be invaded soon anyway.
Posted by: Simon at July 27, 2004 05:29 AM (UKqGy)
5
I will agree that the Norwegian workforce is a bit spoiled, and that does pose some employer issues.
But please... I'm an American living in Norway. Norwegians don't hate America or Americans by any stretch of the imagination. That is simply not true. The US government is pretty universally disliked in Europe, thats for sure... and this expat doesn't care for it either. But to make a statement that Norwegians hate all Americans is ignorant on your part.
Posted by: Murrican at August 19, 2004 07:04 AM (iFV5U)
6
I regret that you did not leave a valid email address so I could correspond with you further on this. Feel free to contact me at the email address I left.
Posted by: RP at August 19, 2004 07:14 AM (LlPKh)
7
I have a few points to make about this issue:
1. Norwegian workers have a lot of rights which US workers don't have. We don't have to work for $5.15 an hour. In fact, the lowest pay per hour you can get in Norway (legally) as an 18 year old with little or no education, is 77 NOK or $12.28. However, few get paid as little as that. The common per hour pay is about $16 or more. Washing floors can get you $18.66 or more an hour.
In the South of the US there are 250,000 illegal Mexican & other Lat.-Am. workers who get paid salaries WELL under your $5.15 bar.
I think it is best to treat your workers like humans, rather than treat them like slaves.
2. Most Norwegians dislike ANY foreign company that buys Norwegian companies. It's not like Norwegians are alone about this. I've heard US citizens grumble about job losses to China and "foreigners meddling in our business" for months.
3. If Norwegians are anti-American, then US citizens are surely anti-European. At times, I have read nothing but negative, incorrect, hateful remarks and articles about Europe (which by the way is presented as though it was a country) and Europeans. I've felt so much hate it's unbeliebable, and the hateful, bigoted, hypocritical lies about Europe have come like a monsun over Sumatra.
4. The richest country in the world is Luxembourg, but Norway is perhaps at a 2nd place.
Posted by: Erik at January 18, 2005 04:30 AM (lnhw0)
8
But what's interesting is how few rights Norwegian employers have to actually terminate employment. How come no one ever cares about that?
Posted by: RP at January 18, 2005 07:59 AM (LlPKh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
True Multiculturalism
We have successfully blended two cultures in our house. My wife is Norwegian and I am an American Jew. Last night, my daughter wanted to clink glasses again at the dinner table. So, I turned to her and said: "Skoal, bubbe." My wife just cracked up and I realized we have acheived the melting pot right in our little house.
Welcome to America!
P.S. My spelling of "skoal" is an approximation because I couldn't get the right Norwegian letter on my keyboard at home.
UPDATE: Correct spelling is: Skål.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
01:31 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hi RP,
great story. If you were from down south perhaps it would have been skoal bubba.
Blessings on your head to all of you. :-)
Posted by: stolypin at July 25, 2004 09:37 PM (xy2ZU)
2
Ivan, you always crack me up! Thanks for the blessings, we need 'em. And, as we used to say in New Orleans, back at ya!
Posted by: RP at July 26, 2004 10:25 AM (LlPKh)
3
"Skoal, Bubba," said Jethro as he held out the chewin' tobacco.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at July 26, 2004 12:12 PM (BqMSp)
4
Thanks for the reminder to change the spelling, TS!
Posted by: RP at July 26, 2004 02:14 PM (LlPKh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NY Times is liberal!?!?
Hold the presses: The NY Times has
admitted that its coverage is liberal and unbalanced. At least, up to a point, they admit it. They note that they are a walking advertisement for gay marriage and never present the dissenting point of view about it. They note that they present too much by way of diversity issues on the sports page. I am shocked they admit it and shocked that they didn't push it as far as they could have. For instance, the "public editor" who wrote this column wants to leave the political issues of the campaign out of this column and wait until the fall until he can tell for sure. Please. Most of us don't feel the need to wait.
The really interesting thing I take away from this is that the complaints about how one sided the Times' coverage is must be forcing some response. Finally. Stay tuned to see if it ever changes, not that I really expect it to.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
01:25 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 1 kb.
Out of the mouth of the babe
My daughter and I were up early this morning and went down to breakfast by ourselves. I asked her what she wanted this morning and instead of telling me, she said:
Give me the beat boys and free my soul. I want to get lost in your rock and roll and drift away.
I was kind of surprised and I asked her where she learned that. She said, "the car, Pappa, the car taught it to me".
So amused.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
01:19 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That is incredibly sweet, Random. I'm impressed, too, because she got the lyrics right. And her comment about the car teaching her the sone just turned me to mush. Ah...you're so lucky right now. :-)
Posted by: Amber at July 25, 2004 02:47 PM (zQE5D)
2
I SO love the girl child!!!!!
Posted by: Wicked H at July 25, 2004 06:53 PM (7TrL0)
3
awww that is sooooo cute!! I want my little girl to do things like that!
Posted by: holly at July 25, 2004 11:20 PM (Wkg+N)
4
After teaching teenagers for a year or so, I thought about putting off having kids for a while, but then I read your stories about yours--and I think "maybe it won't be such a bad thing to have kids".
(I used to want kids *alot* and then I started teaching, and realize I have many! Of course, they're all in that difficult puberty stage!)
Posted by: Mandaleu at July 26, 2004 08:55 AM (nemUU)
5
I'm glad you all are enjoying the stories so much. I feel blessed in general and particularly grateful to have a smart child.
Amanda, don't forget that I am mostly writing about the good moments!
Posted by: RP at July 26, 2004 10:27 AM (LlPKh)
Posted by: Mandalei at July 26, 2004 11:02 AM (nemUU)
7
That beats "Head, shoulders" any day. LOL
Posted by: Jim at July 28, 2004 08:30 AM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 24, 2004
My wife is cool
Nothing ruffles my wife. Not even my daughter and I treating her and the boy to a quiet, but still probably too loud, rendition of "Heads, Shoulders, Knees and Hairy Tushies" during lunch today at our favorite Indian restaurant.
At the conclusion of the song, my daughter turns to my wife and asks:
Hairy tushies, do they taste good? I bet they don't.
My wife just laughed. I suspect my daughter is right but disclaim enough knowledge of the subject to opine with any authority.
One of the nice things about raising kids in this area is the most important diversity of all: culinary. My daughter, aged 3.5, could discuss with us today whether she wanted Mexican or Indian or even Thai. This is just one the best parts of immigration -- good ethnic eats.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
03:07 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 143 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Looks like the 2 of you are raising a couple of very well rounded individuals: good humored and gourmets. Very happy to hear that there are munchkins out there who eat a variety of food stuffs and not the traditional chicken fingers, mac-n-cheese and PB & J. Unfortunately my 9 year old niece has yet to stick a veggie in her mouth.
I always enjoy your stories about the family unit - keep em coming RP.
Posted by: Wicked H at July 24, 2004 06:24 PM (7TrL0)
2
Hi
One of the best things for expats in Hong Kong is seeing their children eating anything and everything. Why? Because their friends are from China, Japan, Thailand, Germany, Australia, Scotland, Vietnam, Mexico, Korea and Argentina. And if little Kia can have sushi for packed lunch why can't I? The children have little or no boundries when it comes to food here. It's great! Or course its good for the grownups too!
Posted by: Mia at July 24, 2004 10:23 PM (JR2GX)
3
I'm glad you are enjoying the stories.
Wicked, we are of the firm belief that you have to expose 'em early or they won't get there until they're out of college. What a waste that would be.
Mia, that sounds like great fun.
Posted by: RP at July 26, 2004 10:29 AM (LlPKh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 23, 2004
test of block quote
This is a test of the Madfish Willie block quote
script I have seen on other people's blogs and really liked.
If this works, it will look really sharp!
So, let's see.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
03:52 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Dude, I just have to have MT now. Those boxes are cool.
Posted by: kb at July 23, 2004 06:44 PM (WxDFb)
2
I'm guessing that it looks like what you wanted!
I actually prefer the "indented" blockquote for some reason. Maybe it's that the
border around the quote makes it seem just a little bit too-oo-oo-oo remote for my own good.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at July 24, 2004 01:12 AM (tpVOv)
3
Very aesthetically pleasing, indeed.
Posted by: Wicked H at July 24, 2004 10:23 AM (7TrL0)
4
TS, how do you do the indented block quote? Is it an html tag or command?
KB, I'm sure that could be arranged.
Posted by: RP at July 26, 2004 10:30 AM (LlPKh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
96kb generated in CPU 0.0228, elapsed 0.0344 seconds.
39 queries taking 0.0172 seconds, 159 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.