October 29, 2004
Why Universities Scare Me
This
article at Front Page Mag. details the adventures of a journalist who infiltrated the "no press allowed" workshop sessions at the recent Duke University sponsored hate fest known as the Palestinian Solidarity Movement and smuggled in a tape recorder. Go and read it. It is, well, horrifying. It is also very long and very detailed.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:56 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I read a fair amount of it -- it's long -- and it is somewhat disturbing. It's worth pointing out, though, that there's nothing new to US academic elites supporting wacky and self-destructive agendas -- look at the support received by Alger Hiss, for instance, or the appeal that various forms of "fellow traveling" in the 1930s had for upper and upper-middle class WASPs. I'm not especially pleased to see the Presbyterians involved, either, but the "respectable Protestant" wing, Presbyterians, Methodists, and UCC haven't had a whole lot to bring people in to church for many years, so it's not surprising that they go off the deep end. That will continue. The more encouraging news, it seems to me, is that the populist-Jacksonian tradition has been moving over to the Republican side and is communicating its impatience with well-bred crazies. I have a feeling the upcoming election may reflect this more than people expect.
Posted by: John Bruce at October 29, 2004 03:48 PM (Orixf)
2
Gee, John, I have you are right about a, let's call it, a backlash of common sense. I am spectical but hopeful. This article really disturbed me.
Posted by: RP at October 30, 2004 12:26 PM (LlPKh)
3
I scanned the article and was disturbed by its content. Nonetheless, thanks for posting it. I was surprised that the dept. of Homeland Security wasn't beating down the doors.
Posted by: Azalea at October 30, 2004 04:47 PM (hRxUm)
4
Add that to what's going on in Columbia U. and, well in the schools across the nation. I really was upset by the going into inner-city schools. Is this currently happening or is it a project for the future? I was confused on the issue, or maybe simply hoping it hasn't occured yet. Where are the principals?
I'm sending the URL to a list I'm on. I hope people wake up and quickly.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at October 31, 2004 03:40 PM (aD0/j)
5
I had to link. I couldn't not. Good work.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at October 31, 2004 03:57 PM (aD0/j)
6
These
remarks by Teresa H. Kerry's son Chris on the campaign trail have been noted on Instapundit and elsewhere, including reference to implicit anti-Semitism -- when Heinz gets done calling W a cokehead, he outlines his problems with W treating "Israel as the 51st state". I think Heinz normally lives in Sweden, by the way, and is slumming to tell the rest of us how to vote. I would not underestimate the level of snobbiness and anti-Semitism among the university "elites", but again, I think there have always been countervailing forces against it.
Posted by: John Bruce at October 31, 2004 04:17 PM (/3UoZ)
Posted by: Simon at November 01, 2004 04:02 AM (FUPxT)
8
John, I saw the Heinz remarks. For a long time now, I have believed that there is no place for a Jew in the Democratic Party. I keep looking for those countervailing forces and I am not cheered.
Thanks for the link, Rachel Anne.
Simon, I gather you must have read it. It is quite scary stuff, I think.
Posted by: RP at November 01, 2004 08:43 AM (LlPKh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
An Update / a Ramble
Herewith a rambling, stream of consciousness, not totally filtered catching up post.
I have not written much this past week or so. I hate that. I have come to enjoy the act of writing non-legal things. I love the comments I get, pro or con, and the dialogues that result. But really, I miss the writing. Sometimes when I write, I want a cigarette. Well, not really want so much as remember times past when I would write late into the night with coffee cooling next to me and an ashtray with a burning cigarette in it on the desk. I miss that part of smoking, the part that I associate with those nights and that kind of creativity. I quit smoking some ten and a half years ago, in the days after I sat for the NY Bar Exam. I figured that would be the most stressful moment and once I got past it, I could and should quit. And so I did. Now, of course, I hate smoking. I hate being behind people on the street when they smoke and I hate bars or restaurants filled with smoke. But it is a special kind of hate because I know that I miss it, like I miss that 21 year old kid smoking "Peter Rouge" in Paris in 1988-89. Paris memories involve smoking. Damn I miss that.
I had no intention of writing about smoking, by the way, so I suppose my lead in that this would be stream of consciousness was correct. I will stop here on the smoking and the callow youth I once was. Although, I suppose it is natural to reflect back on what seemed to be simpler times and the person I once was since I am staring my birthday right in the face. Monday, in fact. Another year passed in which I once again managed to dodge the sabre toothed tiger (that's how I cheerfully think of it). But that's not quite what I intended to write about either.
No, I was going to write about: thinking. I have enough time these days to write, but not enough time to think and to organize my thoughts enough to draft a coherent paragraph with a natural and orderly progression of point to point to conclusion. That's why my posts have been so short of late. More in the nature of random observations or remarks than anything I am particularly proud of. No, the problem is I am too busy to think. This is the luxury I crave. Time to step back from the rushed and harried existence. Time to reflect on my observations, to organize them, to see if I can learn anything from them. Time to record these observations as engraved images on my brain, like a print maker makes an impression. Otherwise, the observations are fleeting and they leave with a sort of, "gosh, I have to remember this so I can write about it later" sigh, but they do leave. Like yesterday, I have a half formed impression from seeing two young woman facing each other on the subway, one playing a game boy, the other clutching a text book on international financial management. I had thoughts about the value of education and the soul destroying nature of video games, but they have not fully crystalized and may never.
I also took some time away from the office yesterday to go renew my driver licence which is set to expire on Monday. I walked guided only by a need to go South and West and a desire to keep moving, so I went where the traffic lights sent me and I ended up wandering through the West 30's, a part of town not greatly frequented by tourists. It is the heart, still, of what we in NY call the shmatta trade. The rag trade. The fashion business. Full of wholesale only clothing and all the fabric stores. It is kind of seedy and dingy and full of men pushing expensive clothing through the streets on rolling racks. Clothing you might expect to see next season in the department stores. I think that's fun. It made me want to buy a small, pocket sized digital camera for my birthday to be able to carry with me and take pictures of interesting things on the street so I can post them here. There was one old fashioned barber shop that I would have liked to take a picture of, for sure. Otherwise, renewing my licence was painless and quick. I was, to quote an English friend, gobsmacked at how easy it was. Something has changed drastically at the DMV. I distrust it but I like it.
I am going to be working all weekend, again. I suspect that this might just be the case through Thanksgiving. This is the part of my job I sometimes hate, but not really. I mean, yes, I hate that I will not be seeing my kids or my wife very much but I enjoy working hard. I think that there is a reward unto itself when you stretch your capacity and work hard. Especially if the work is interesting. That's one nice thing about practicing law, the work is usually interesting and requires me to become a quick expert on whatever my client's business is. Right now, its high stakes real estate development and the financing and construction aspects specifically.
That said, I think I grow a little weary of this professional life, weary of the conflict, weary of trying to separate the truth from the untruth. You know what? Truth is inherently malleable. It really is a matter of perception when trying to establish the truth between two competing versions of events. I used to think that truth was TRUTH -- simple and inviolate. It isn't really. There are concepts that cannot be distinguished away and their may be scientific, unarguable truths, but to say that one person swears one thing is true and the other swears the other is true and therefore one is lying is not necessarily the case. They may both be convinced they are each telling the truth. And then the fact finder, judge or jury, decides which version is more credible and thus which is the truth. This is tiring. Especially when you begin to think that your own client may have a more casual relationship with the truth than you are comfortable with. Enough said, I think. Except, perhaps, a word of caution: don't lie to your own lawyer. I hope I don't need to explain why this is a bad idea, do I? One other thing, even if I may be experiencing enough burn out with my current profession to be looking up MBA programs on the web, I am old enough to know that I should not be making any long term decisions under the over worked / under rested circumstances. I'm just thinking about other options without allowing myself to take a position I may have problems retreating from. I think that counts as wisdom and not timidity. But I may just be inclined to self-generosity here.
In the midst of all of this, I had a win yesterday. A motion I filed back in February and which was submitted to the Court in May was finally decided in October. The Court favored my clients with a 10 page decision, which is unusually long for State Court. I moved to dismiss 8 counts of a complaint and I won on 6 of them, have a good argument to renew my motion on the seventh after we serve an answer to the complaint, and know for a fact that the plaintiff cannot prove the eighth count. We'll spend a little time in discovery, which is expensive, but the big threats have been removed. My clients are thrilled. Now they just have to pay their outstanding bills which I think and hope they'll be able to do.
Well, back to work now. Here endeth the ramble. I hope you enjoyed it. And if not, that's ok, too. I am not re-reading it or editing it before posting, by the way. It is truly unfiltered.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:49 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1375 words, total size 7 kb.
1
Smoking is a harsh mistress (or mister)RP. I quit for 17 years. Quit cold turkey while I was in law school. 17 years later, on a business trip to Europe (during the break up of my marriage) while surrounded by smokers I took it up again for a year. It was as if I had never quit. All the smoking mannerisms returned almost immediately: juggling a coffee or a drink with a cigarette; lighting up in the wind; etc. Quitting the second time was much harder than the 1st. I feel deprived of the 'mannerisms' if not the nicotine.
As to career changes, no need not to think of them. This is a second career for me (12 years in the transportation biz between undergrad and law school) and have to say it was a good change. Guess the legal career was my answer to burn out . . . which is the opposite of most law trajectories. :-)
Posted by: ivan at October 29, 2004 10:10 AM (A27TY)
2
I always enjoy your ramblings, Random. Ramble away. :-)
Truth...yes. It is not absolute. Just another reason why when people insist on breaking everything down to "black and white", I want to thump them on the head with an umbrella.
It's never that simple. Probably a good thing, really. If life were that simple, things would be much more boring, I think.
Posted by: Amber at October 29, 2004 12:11 PM (zQE5D)
3
Your unfiltered ramblings are as welcome as the other kind. Different flavors of the same wonderful dish.
I know from quitting smoking.... How much that brought back.
Two of my relatives both changed careers as lawyers a couple of times. One from litigation to mediation ... and the other from corporate to family advocacy. They seemed subtle to the outsider like me,("You're still a lawyer, though, right?".
Then a few years ago I went from managing small projects as an all-purpose tool (planning, executing, writing the supporting materials, providing the training) to being a program manager, where I manage all sort of people who do each of the bits and it is my job to ensure delivery. It sounds like a progression, and it somewhat was, but my days are completely different now.
We're humans, we need change. Nuanced or blunt.

Thanks again for the thought-provoking post!
Posted by: Elizabeth at October 30, 2004 10:42 AM (ehQxN)
4
Thanks for the great comments, y'all. I'm just impressed you got this far. When I put it into WordPerfect to spell check it, it was 3 single spaced pages, which is a lot to ask people to read.
I'm sorry I don't have the time to respond as I'd like to, but please know that I've read and enjoyed all of your comments.
Posted by: RP at October 30, 2004 12:24 PM (LlPKh)
5
Penseur, what a great post.
Stream of consciousness is so much better than cadavre exquise, I think. There's a progression that often leads to unexpected places.
For your readers, it's an experience where our minds move along the same paths as yours.
Posted by: emilyohyes at October 30, 2004 12:45 PM (n4KpH)
6
I really enjoyed this post as well! Thx RP!
Posted by: indigo at November 02, 2004 03:38 AM (5PkrR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 28, 2004
Happy news update: Yay, Jim!
Jim is now joining the ranks of the previously unemployed.
HE GOT A NEW JOB!!!
Yay, Jim!
Posted by: Random Penseur at
08:28 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yay, Jim!
And, just a few hours early, a
HAPPY BIRTHDAY! to you, RP!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at October 31, 2004 06:39 PM (wA+T+)
2
Thanks RP. I meant to come here when we were emailing about the trackbacks but like so many things in this past crazy couple of weeks it got pushed clear out of the cranium.
By the way, this job kicks serious ass.
Hopefully not mine. ;-)
Posted by: Jim at November 08, 2004 08:46 AM (tyQ8y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The End of Personal Responsibility
The time of personal responsibility has passed. No longer will you have to admit fault or recognize that the error or mistake lies within you, and not within the stars or some other silly excuse. In a development in Norway which I am sure will be reproduced as soon as possible in the United States, it has become impossible to imprison the "
mentally ill", whatever that means.
A Stavanger man convicted 25 times and with 70 offences on the books since his last conviction may be able to sue for damages thanks to new laws. The man has now been diagnosed as 'extremely mentally handicapped' since 1992, and should have received treatment rather than prison time.
The man's defense counsel, John Christian Elden, has filed to reopen cases involving 19 convictions since 1992.
District attorney Tormod Haugnes told newspaper Stavanger Aftenbladet that authorities have little choice but to acquit since it is not possible to imprison the mentally handicapped.
"New rules give him the right to commit crimes for the rest of his life, without punishment," Haugnes told the paper. "This is the most extreme result of the new penal code, where preventive detention is replaced with custody and compulsory treatment."
Elden told Aftenbladet that his client could demand compensation for the unjustified imprisonment for the seven to eight years he served for the convictions, and said the damages could likely amount to millions of crowns.
Please tell me that I am not the only one who thinks that this is outrageous, especially considering how easy it can be to manipulate the mental health system.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
07:53 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 275 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Hmmm...
While I sort of agree that this is eliminating the need for personal liability, I don't think it's the blank check to go on a crime spending spree, necessarily. Personally, I do feel that it is up to the penal sytem to be able to evaluate and treat criminals as well-one of the basic principles of a penal system is to be as a rehabilitation and a deterrant. So the government does have the responsibility to treat the people it is trying to rehabilitate.
In my mind, anyone who is able to perpetrate certain offenses-murder, crimes against children, repeat offenders-are quite likely mentally ill, and do most likely need treatment. If governments aren't willing to accept that some inmates need treatment, they'd better be prepared to see said inmates again and again.
That said, I don't see that the former inmates have the ability to go for damages in the millions of crowns area, I do agree that's outrageous, but I do think that they should be given access to state mental health care.
And from someone who was in the mental health care system in Scandinavia, let me tell you-it is NOT easy to manipulate the system. And I lived in the most tolerant of the countries, where they like to give prisoners a little bit of jail time and a good cuddle before letting them go again.
Posted by: Helen at October 28, 2004 09:23 AM (DCpYG)
2
I don't believe that legislation would ever come across the ocean, especially to the US. North Americans tend to be more of the "lock 'em up, so I don't have to look at 'em" mentality. In Canada at least, the criminals get a good education and come out with all sorts of new concepts on committing crime. We also tend to let the mentally ill roam the streets, because the lack of allocation of funding for those types of institutions.
Posted by: Oorgo at October 28, 2004 11:04 AM (lM0qs)
3
If you haven't already seen it, there's a good piece
at OpinionJournal today on related initiative efforts to dilute California's three-strikes law. I suspect the thing won't pass, as Gov. Terminator is now doing ads against it.
In the US, these issues are, and rightly should be, part of the political process, and features which I don't believe the Europeans have, like the initiative and the recall, influence policy in these areas. I've read now and then -- but have never seen comprehensive analysis -- that the European democracies don't have a number of features that allow the majority to express itself in areas like taxation and capital punishment, to name two issues.
Posted by: John Bruce at October 28, 2004 02:26 PM (qHtTC)
4
I suspect they want to keep them out of jail so they won't be unduly influenced by the strippers they provide the other prisoners.
Posted by: ivan at October 29, 2004 10:05 AM (A27TY)
5
Gee, thoughtful comments, one and all. I enjoyed reading them even if I lack the time to reply to you all. Thanks!
Posted by: RP at October 30, 2004 12:22 PM (LlPKh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 26, 2004
Munch Museum Robbery Update
The update is, well, there is still no news, no leads, and the museum itself remains closed. As we previously discussed
here and
here, Aftenposten
reports:
"We ain't got squat", said the police. Ok, they didn't really say that, but it amounts to the same thing. They are no closer to solving the robbery or returning the paintings now then they were back in August when the robbery took place.
I am not filled with hope or optimism, at this point.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
01:58 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This is really sad. I wonder what the thieves hope to gain...to keep the pictures, well they can't benefit finacially from that, they won't be able to show family and friends unless they can guarantee their silence, and there has been no attempt made at ransoming them has there? Just some fool who has no better way of making a name for himself I guess.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at October 28, 2004 01:20 AM (CrUiC)
2
This was a tragedy.
My favorite Munch painting, the Madonna, was one of the two stolen. Its lines undulate along with her body, radiating dark colors contrast with bloodless skin.
Unfortunately, there's often a large profit for those who steal paintings: there's a black market for anything, especially for art and antiques.
The Isabella Stuart Gardener museum in Boston, by far the most beautiful museum I've ever seen (it's in her home, a gorgeous 19th century reproduction of an Italian villa) still has blank spaces with cards noting the too-numerous renaissance masterpieces that were stolen a few years ago.
Posted by: emily at October 30, 2004 12:52 PM (n4KpH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 25, 2004
Quick report
I have a moment to make a quick report, in case anyone was wondering where I've been. I have, since Friday morning, now billed 30 hours in preparing my emergency application. I smell bad, my glasses are filthy, I am out of emergency chocolate, and my desk is a wreck of old torn up drafts, empty coffee cups, lost pens, files, folders, documents -- both originals and copies, statute and form books, and transcripts. I have a notice of motion, a memorandum of law, and, most importantly, an affidavit for my client to sign. I will serve it all tomorrow morning and then see about digging out. I believe it will hit the plaintiff right between the eyes.
This is not the fun and romantic career I thought I was getting into when I used to watch L.A. Law.
I hope I have not missed much fun stuff on all the other blogs.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
04:27 PM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 157 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hang in there, RP! Hope it gets better for you soon!
Posted by: GrammarQueen at October 25, 2004 05:52 PM (gDEwS)
2
As I dig out of my own hole--surfacing from 9th grade research papers and parent phone calls about kids who need to get into Harvard 4 years from now, and whose lives I personally have shattered because of this grade--I am sending you zen vibes of hope and good cheer. Rock on with your bad self!
Posted by: Mandalei at October 25, 2004 07:43 PM (PibH1)
3
*rushes into room with armful of halloween candy*
here - hand me your glasses
*uses soft cloth and wipes away grit*
there - talk to you later
Posted by: standing naked at October 25, 2004 10:27 PM (IAJcf)
4
As someone who has worked for over ten years in insurance defense -- GO GETTEM, TIGER!!
And as always, hug your support staff.
*grin*
xoxo
Posted by: Margi at October 26, 2004 12:20 AM (MAdsZ)
5
Ugh, ugh. I hope your newest efforts knock the socks off the plaintiff and your client gets what they deserve.
Also wishing you a full nights sleep, a vacation with the family, and chocolate. Plenty of chocolate.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at October 26, 2004 01:41 AM (RgxV/)
6
OUT of 'emergency chocolate' , this is bad!
Posted by: Mia at October 26, 2004 02:08 AM (6kWIG)
7
I avoided watching
L.A. Law, at all costs, just because it was on TV.
The
work is the thrill! The pain is only yer growth! May we all yet suffer as much as ye, me matey!
Oop, sorry.
Talk Like A Pirate Day was last month...
Posted by: Tuning Spork at October 26, 2004 03:04 AM (OcLmo)
8
Ok, wow. Thanks for all the great comments and very kind wishes and thoughts. Today is serve the papers day and then things will settle down a bit.
The boss, by the way, thought I did a great job. So, that's nice, at least.
Posted by: RP at October 26, 2004 07:40 AM (LlPKh)
Posted by: John Bruce at October 26, 2004 11:00 AM (MRbP2)
10
Damn, John, you remember that? In fact, he is.
Posted by: RP at October 26, 2004 11:24 AM (LlPKh)
11
What have you missed on blogs? Where do I begin!
Jim of SBD has gone gay. Finally, he's come out of the closet and admitted secretly he's always wanted to spend his life in drag and grow old surrounded by 50 cats and the original recordings of all of Debbie Reynold's songs.
Ravings of a Corporate Mommy? Well, Elizabeth and her family have quit the rat race nad now own a farm of sunflowers, which will be run as a cooperative.
And me? I'm on the lam. I stole that painting after all-I mean, it was easy to do. I speak Swedish, after all

Hang in there, baby.
Posted by: Helen at October 26, 2004 02:30 PM (DCpYG)
12
I've been outed? Damn.
Well, it was only a metter of time.
Debbie Reynolds rules!!!!!
Posted by: Jim at October 26, 2004 04:16 PM (GCA5m)
13
1)Order in chocolate at next opportunity. I thought you NY'ers could order in anything.
2)Burn material on top of desk
3)Use fire to roast marshmallows and make s'mores or Stinky, whatever comes first
4)Give self a long holiday weekend.
5)Institue "costume" only dress code at the firm.
Posted by: Azalea at October 26, 2004 06:33 PM (hRxUm)
14
Oops, I'm late (again!) but...hang in there, stay warm, go get 'em, YAY RANDOM! GRRRRR!
(How's zat?)
Posted by: Amber at October 26, 2004 07:18 PM (zQE5D)
15
Hope it works out RP, I'm your your memo of law was terrific. Based upon your prior comments about the quality of justice your client received below I'm sure you'll get a good result.
Ivan
Posted by: ivan at October 26, 2004 09:49 PM (xy2ZU)
16
I thought about you today, and just wanted to send some more good wishes.
*wish*wish*wish*wish*wish*wish*wish*wish*wish*wish*
Posted by: Mandalei at October 27, 2004 06:18 PM (PibH1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Another reason to love New York
This from the Metropolitan Diary today (a beautiful moment of perfect NY co-existence):
As Jay Jennings was walking to work on 34th Street during the recent Jewish holidays, he waited while a line of Orthodox men entered a synagogue in front of him.
A hip-hop kid, in basketball jersey and baggy jeans, stopped beside him, looked over the line of men in black hats and suits and nodded.
"Yeah," he said to no one in particular, "kicking it old school."
This fits perfectly with this moment which I blogged about some time ago.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:12 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 105 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Something tells me the men in the line would've smiled, hearing that.
Posted by: Helen at October 25, 2004 01:46 PM (DCpYG)
2
Love it! Dan grew up there, you know, and he knows so much about Jewish & Italian culture. Or word meanings. I don't know anything. Whenever I hear Yiddish or Italian in movies or TV, I always turn to Dan and he knows what was just said!
But his ancestors are Swedish!
Dan says everyone who lives there eventually becomes a little bit of everything. *grins*
Posted by: Amber at October 26, 2004 07:16 PM (zQE5D)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 22, 2004
Norwegian Law Enforcement: Strippers and Help to Find Drugs
Story #1
According to this article:
a Norwegian prisoner secretly hired an exotic dancer to spice up the prison's monthly culture night. The woman got all her clothes off, to the cheers of the male inmates, before guards could react on Wednesday night at the Hof minimum security prison in southern Norway.
When they come for me, and they will, remind me that I want to serve my time in Norway, will you?
Story #2
From Jan, at Secular Blasphemy (which I recommend checking out in general), we have the story of a drug courier who forgot where he buried his stash and, concerned that the dealer would get to him, called the police to ask them to help him find it!
My guess is that the guy might have heard about stripper night at the local prison.
UPDATE:
At least the drug idiot in Norway knew what he was doing. Here in the US, our drug idiots appear to be much stupider. Here we have the heartwarming story of Vicki Lynn Nunnery, 43, of Callaway, Florida who dialed 911 by mistake, hung up the phone, and was later arrested when the police came to investigate the disconnected call (as they do in case someone was hurt) and discovered "one the largest methamphetamine laboratories ever found in Bay County". D'oh!
Posted by: Random Penseur at
02:14 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 238 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Discrimination! That's what it is! Where's the prison where they serve chocolate, give you unlimited time in the bathtub and have daily massages!
Posted by: Rachel Ann at October 23, 2004 03:41 PM (fj3tO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Red Sox Win, Boston Loses
All over the blog-o-sphere yesterday, you could find Red Sox fans gloating. Most of them, at the least the two I like the most (
Irish Elk and
SCSU Scholars), were doing so tastefully and amusingly and I suggest you go check out their take on the internet victory dance.
But here's the thing, the Red Sox won, and I take my hat off to them for a fantastic performance (and it really was stunningly fabulous), but Boston lost. Why? They set cars on fire and rioted. It reminds me of some old football coach who said when one of his players danced in the end zone, "try to act like you've been there before" (Bear Bryant, maybe?).
Why is it that you never see NY set on fire by sports fans?
UPDATE:
According to the NY Post, a young woman was shot in the head and killed during a clash with Boston cops. According to the article:
Moments after the Red Sox' 10-3 ALCS win early Thursday, some 80,000 delirious Boston faithful poured out from bars and clubs. Fans went out of control, burning a car, hurling bottles and clashing with riot cops, resulting in 16 injuries and eight arrests.
One cop's nose was broken by a flying bottle and officials are considering banning alcohol sales during the World Series games.
The chaos reached its fiery climax on Boylston Street, a block from Fenway, when a few hundred drunken hooligans attacked a parked Nissan Xterra that bore New York plates.
The crowd smashed its windows and set it on fire.
My condolences to her family. What a waste.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:49 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 278 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Los Angeles had a problem with this for a while, too, but LAPD suddenly realized that after any game with a potentially big impact, win or lose, they had to have extra presence on the streets. The problem then stopped.
I don't normally watch cable TV, but my wife and I were out of town a couple of weeks ago and saw a show on Animal Planet about New York's mounted officers, who are routinely deployed around Yankee Stadium under such circumstances. I would guess that only New York fully understands their use in crowd control and preventing riots, although LAPD has started up its own mounted unit within the past 10 years.
Posted by: John Bruce at October 22, 2004 10:31 AM (uXGqY)
2
There is something about a horse that makes most people just back up a little.
That said, we generally only riot in NY when someone gets shot or the lights go out. Not for sporting events.
Posted by: RP at October 22, 2004 11:42 AM (LlPKh)
3
I just don't get it. It's like reading about beings on another planet doing something completely nonsensical and alien to me.
I cannot understand the point of rioting when your team *wins*. So very odd.
Posted by: Amber at October 24, 2004 01:27 PM (zQE5D)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Yesterday Sucked, with like 3 capital S's
I rank yesterday up there in the top 5 worst professional days I have ever had the joy to experience. I cannot, for reasons obvious to at least me, go into great detail about this, so you may not get the full flavor of why, for instance, I actually wanted to throw up at one point. But I will try to summarize just a little bit, if only to help myself move past it.
1. That motion to take discovery? Lost. All of it. Every bit of the relief requested. Why? The Judge loathes my client. Also, it was a totally cold bench (she didn't read one single word of the papers my firm charged my client thousands of dollars to prepare). I get spoiled by appearing mostly in the Commercial Division when I'm in State Court. Ivan Chonkin (if he stops by today) will understand about this since he's had the experience. Then, the judge simply fucked me. No other way to describe it. She is withholding the decision on the motion and refusing to issue a stay. When I said to her that by doing so she would prevent me from going to the Appellate Division to seek a stay, she told me that she would not issue an order just to permit me to "run up huge costs and expense and generate a lot of paper". This was at the end of the appearance. I became so angry here my hands started to shake. I put my finger in front of her, told her that I do not practice law to bring meritless motions or do anything just to run up the costs, I resented the implication that I did, that I had done nothing in front of her that could have ever given her that impression, and that she was out of line. I have never yelled at a judge before and I guarantee my voice was raised. And you know what? She said that she was sorry and that she didn't mean to give that impression. Fuck her.
2. The judge has withheld the decision, as I said above. I am now preparing a motion to by brought by notice of motion (because denial of an ex parte application brought by emergency order to show cause is not an appealable paper in NY) that will request relief in something like 6 parts, with many subparts, and it has to be served by no later than Tuesday. I will be here all weekend. This motion is pure damage control because there ain't no way she's granting it. I will be writing for the appellate panel here.
3. I lost an appeal in another case. A decision came down on an appeal and the appellate court didn't even address the arguments we made. Also, and much much much worse, the client is devastated, both personally and financially. His marriage has broken up over the stress. I'm glad I did not have to make the call to tell him, coward that I am.
I met my wife for dinner afterwards because it was date night and we hadn't been alone for about 2 weeks. It was not joyous but just being with her can sometimes make things a lot better.
But the best part of all? Coming home to find my daughter was still awake, letting her get out of bed while I took my tie and suit off, and then sitting with her in her rocking chair and rocking, chatting, and rubbing her back until it was time to put her back to bed. That did more to salvage my day than I think anything could have.
Finally, I will leave you with a funny Girl Child story, to reward you for getting this far. The nanny told us about it when we got home. She and the GC had the following conversation:
GC: I know, let's switch listening skills. I'll take yours and you take mine.
N: Ok. Hey, GC, let's go, its time for your bath.
[silence]
N: Hey, you have to listen to me because you have my listening skills and I always listen.
GC: [looks up at her] Fine. I want mine back.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:38 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 709 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Hang in there, RP! And you're right -- the little ones are good for perspective, and for solace. Cheers, MCNS
Posted by: Mark C N Sullivan at October 22, 2004 12:12 PM (q9XsZ)
2
Yeah, little girls have a way of brightening up an otherwise dark world at times, don't they!
At least the weekend's here. Hope things look better next week!
Posted by: Mick at October 22, 2004 12:51 PM (VhRca)
3
just being with her...
that did more to slavage my day...
RP, you are a wealthy man.
i am so glad you found comfort at home.
terribly sorry about the day though...
Posted by: standing naked at October 22, 2004 06:37 PM (IAJcf)
4
Right, there's one judge who'll be up against the wall when the Revolution comes.
Posted by: Andrew Cusack at October 23, 2004 04:00 AM (KWqwc)
5
Oh Random! What a terrible thing to have to listen to. I go bonkers whenever anyone even hints I might be lacking in principles. I'm glad you stood up for yourself.
And the GC is simply adorable! Actually, I'm getting so bad about missing little children, plus the fact my best friend is trying fo her third child, that I jumped all over Lucy Friday night after having a LOT of wine. I cringe now, but at the time I said something along the lines of, "Just go home and get pregnant! I don't care anymore how you do it, Lucy, I just need you to DO IT! I NEED A GRANDCHILD!"
Then I threatened to have one myself if she didn't. Lucy just laughed at me with affection and Dan rolled his eyes (also with affection).
And I had a headache the next morning. Figures. ;-)
Posted by: Amber at October 24, 2004 01:24 PM (zQE5D)
6
LOL! You are my sunshine... my only sunshine... and you make me happy, when I feel ________... you're so lucky to have her!
Posted by: Hannah at October 25, 2004 11:46 AM (7dELN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 20, 2004
Sorry about the quiet today
I wanted to blog a lot today. There were a number of things that interested me and I wanted to write about them. Instead, I have been preparing for oral argument for tomorrow to defeat, I hope, a $30 million or so claim. Or at least get the Court to give me discovery on damages and I have a novel theory that I am hoping the Court will allow me at least to pursue. If not, off to the Appellate Division. But I write instead to tell you that at 4:08 p.m. I just finished the last of the black coffee I bought at 7:15 this morning. That tells you all that you need to know about my day today, I bet.
At least I am feeling better physically. Thanks again for all your good wishes!
Posted by: Random Penseur at
04:12 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 146 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And here I was thinking you were obsessed with the Yankees.
Posted by: kb at October 20, 2004 05:04 PM (jVRaJ)
2
good morning.
good luck today - may all go the way you want them to.
and glad to see you are...well...i'll say feeling better.
Posted by: standing naked at October 21, 2004 06:23 AM (IAJcf)
3
Wishing luck and a wonderful time, for you and your client.
Posted by: michele at October 21, 2004 11:49 PM (ht2RK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 19, 2004
Spiced Ham Email
I got the following email from someone who's name looked vaguely familiar and so I opened it. The subject line was simply "hey". It had a link to a website which I shall not reproduce here and above the link, the following suggestion:
"drop the hammer on the next bitch you lay it to. . ."
I have no idea what it really means, and I'm too chicken to click on the link, but it sounds so tough. Maybe the author is overcompensating for latent homosexual feelings?
Posted by: Random Penseur at
01:42 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Drop the hammer? Is that what it's called these days???
Posted by: Mick at October 19, 2004 02:51 PM (VhRca)
2
Actually, the term has a long heritage. Mike Hammer, private eye, for instance. Or why do you think they (at least allegedly) call Tom DeLay "The Hammer"?
Posted by: John Bruce at October 19, 2004 03:05 PM (DjxFm)
3
I actually kind of thought "dropping the hammer" meant to shoot someone. Do they really call DeLay the hammer?
Posted by: RP at October 19, 2004 04:16 PM (LlPKh)
4
I think this was an accusation by the Democrats during the 2002 race, to show what an unpleasant character DeLay was. They apparently took it to mean that DeLay would hammer Republicans who didn't toe the line. But if they call someone a hammer, that may not be the only connotation. I've also heard it referred to, in judicial contexts, as a groin gavel.
Posted by: John Bruce at October 19, 2004 05:59 PM (0pjxH)
5
LMAO!!! Groin gavel? Really? Where, in the history of mankind, did anyone say that with a straight face? I know some judges. . . .. ANYWAY.
And on a related and more serious note (to hopefully help younger men, everywhere): Honey, if you're trying to knock the bottom out of it, you're, a) going to get tired faster, and b) not exactly going to ensure the enjoyment of your partner. There's a time and a place for everything. Use that particular move sparingly.
[/psa]
Posted by: Margi at October 19, 2004 06:36 PM (MAdsZ)
6
Let's just say you wouldn't find the expression "groin gavel" in a law review article.
Posted by: John Bruce at October 19, 2004 07:09 PM (efJ/5)
7
I'm young and even I don't have any clue what the deuce that's supposed to mean. Maybe since I'm 20 now they stopped sending me memos on the new lingo.
Posted by: Andrew Cusack at October 19, 2004 07:37 PM (KWqwc)
8
"Drop the hammer" could easily be a euphemism for the dreaded performance problem that strikes some men on occasion (though not myself, of course - I let loose with both barrels whenever duty calls ;-)
"It was going great, I was really giving it to her but then I dropped the hammer. She said it was okay, that it happens to everybody sooner or later, but it was still pretty embarrassing."
Posted by: Jim at October 19, 2004 09:35 PM (GCA5m)
9
Maybe it's some sort of mysoginistic reference to putting women in their place "Lay it to her" maybe means slapper her around.
Of course maybe I'm reading too much into it, it could mean how to get life back in your johnson after smoking too much crack.
Posted by: Oorgo at October 20, 2004 12:32 PM (lM0qs)
10
RP,
If, in the immortal words of John Lennon, happiness is a warm gun, bang-bang, shoot-shot, then the meaning of dropping the hammer (puerile though it may be) does take on the intended meaning. Of course, in order to shoot most gun (at least older ones) the gun had to be cocked first. Of course, many men who consider themselves to be gunslingers of this sort do tend to have itchy trigger fingers, so to speak, and have been known to dischrge their firearms a bit prematurely . . . hence the expression shooting oneself in the foot. In some dueling circles it is more polite to have ones 'opponent' discharge their weapon before you discharge ones own.
Having now fulfilled my quota of mixed metaphors, inapproriate similes, etc. for the month, I now retire.
Ivan
Posted by: ivan at October 20, 2004 01:38 PM (A27TY)
11
Okay, Ivan, that had me laughing out loud.
I was reminded some time late last night of "Full Metal Jacket" you know, the Marine boot camp chant:
This is my rifle, this is my gun;
This is for shooting, this is for fun.
Sorta gives new meaning to going off half-cocked, don't it?
Okay, I'm going, now. Heh.
Posted by: Margi at October 20, 2004 03:04 PM (MAdsZ)
12
By the way RP,
good idea NOT to open any of those e-mails.
[And thank you Margi]
Posted by: ivan at October 20, 2004 04:01 PM (A27TY)
13
Hi, Penseur ~ I like your take on this! Not a "I'm so sick of spam" but guarded curiosity.
Posted by: emily at October 22, 2004 06:36 AM (aKUzN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Weapon of Mass Destruction: Conference Room Version
Beware the
Eradicator the next time you pontificate at a meeting. There is no way corporate security can keep this one out. None of us are safe.
You've been warned.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
12:45 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I've got my people working on one of these right now. Thanks for the tip!
Posted by: Mick at October 19, 2004 02:51 PM (VhRca)
2
That is AWESOME...Luckily, I've saved several hundred empty CD cases, rubber bands and old mechanical pencils. I will equip my army shortly and stage a coup!
Viva la Revolucion!
Posted by: Howard at October 19, 2004 03:13 PM (vYCZY)
3
Let me know how it works. I figure it ought to be able to penetrate just about any powerpoint print out presentation.
Posted by: RP at October 19, 2004 04:15 PM (LlPKh)
Posted by: Margi at October 19, 2004 06:39 PM (MAdsZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Back at work today
Well, I was back yesterday, too, just not for more than the morning. Then I left, fell deeply asleep on the train home, woke up two stops before mine (its a gift), and went home to pick my nap back up from where I left it on the train. I was feeling so sick and so drained and tired yesterday. Today marks a marginal improvement. I am cautiously optimistic, but not much more. Which is rough, considering that I lack the motivation or power to deal with some fairly complex issues today. I know that they are complex because I read the words in the cases and I don't understand them at all. That's ok. There's no real rush. Except that I have a crucial oral argument on Thursday morning and I really have to prepare for it. Tons of reading, synthesizing and outlining to do. Oh, joy.
I see three possible outcomes on Thursday. One, she denies the motion and I work all weekend to run to the Appellate Division on Monday to humbly beg for a stay of the case pending disposition of the appeal. Two, she grants my motion and then I work all weekend to get the benefits of her decision. Three, she grants my motion and she adjourns the upcoming proceedings and I don't have to work all weekend. I, of course, am holding out hope for #3.
Many thanks to everyone who sent their kind wishes for a speedy recovery. They were a very pleasant surprise and I was touched.
I did spend much of Sunday making home made chicken soup. My wife has remarked that she likes it when I get sick because then I cook a lot. Chicken soup is really an all day thing, especially if you start from scratch. But it makes the house smell soooo good.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
12:35 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 315 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Hoping for #3, dude. Hope you're feeling better!
Posted by: Mick at October 19, 2004 02:52 PM (VhRca)
2
Thanks, Mick! You're the best!
Posted by: RP at October 19, 2004 04:16 PM (LlPKh)
3
Homemade chicken soup and a weekend off. Who could ask for anything more?
Posted by: Jim at October 19, 2004 07:58 PM (GCA5m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Slurpee Machine was Broken
I was so amused by
this story in Aftenposten about a murderer and rapist escaping from jail and then turning himself in so I had to supply my own answer to the question of why the convict turned himself in. Clearly, he could not get a slurpee.
Seriously, how soft must life be in a Norwegian jail if a convict calls the police from a 7-11 to come get him after a successful escape? As some of you may know, there was a point in 1999 when the Norwegian Supreme Court government refused to extradite a convicted drug smuggler from Norway to the US because it was felt that the US prisons were too harsh.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
10:43 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
October 15, 2004
Goodbye week (and good riddance!)
I have tried not to whine too much this week about the nasty week this has been -- work; long car trip; business trip to Philly; other deadlines, etc. I have probably failed in that. Oh, well. It's my party and I'll whine if I want to, whine if I want to, whine if I want to; you would whine to if it happened to you, du du du du, du.
Seriously, I greeted the day with sharp pains in my ears at 4:00. Not good. Suspecting ear infections, I called the doctor at 4:15 and left a message begging to be seen this morning because of the pain. Also, every time I swallowed, it felt like I was trying to take down a tennis ball. So, I had tea and read Wednesday's NY Times which was still hanging around the house and which arrived after I had already left on Wednesday. That was an interesting news day. Did you know that Frank Ghery and Snohetta are going to be designing buildings at Ground Zero? I didn't. There was also a great article on a subject I've long had an interest in: economic and political inequality and disparity in China where, once again, the peasants are getting the shaft.
My wife kindly drove me over to the Doctor to be there at 8:30. On the way, I tried to reach them again by cell phone, only to be told by the officious receptionist that the Doctor couldn't possibly see me before 11:00. Not acceptable. I was kind of steamed. So, my wife pulled in, parked, and we went in to the office to suggest that maybe the Doctor could find a moment to see me now. The receptionist repeated that there was nothing she could do. I said to her, "I called you at 4:15 this morning because of the pain, it is now four hours past that and you are seriously suggesting that I patiently wait for another two and half hours?" She looked at me and said she'd go check with the Doctor. Which she did and said that the Doctor would squeeze me in. I think it is a lot easier to say no to people on the phone than in person. A lesson there for us all.
So, here I am at work, surrounded by mounds of shite I have no interest in getting through, dreaming instead of the golden hued chicken soup I intend to make this weekend, and whining on my blog.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
02:30 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 428 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Awww! Please get better really soon, mkay?
Posted by: Margi at October 15, 2004 03:15 PM (MAdsZ)
Posted by: GrammarQueen at October 15, 2004 04:47 PM (gDEwS)
Posted by: Azalea at October 15, 2004 06:59 PM (hRxUm)
4
It may be, of course, that you sounded like a ticked-off litigation attorney.
Posted by: John Bruce at October 16, 2004 11:20 AM (MRbP2)
Posted by: Mick at October 16, 2004 11:33 AM (VhRca)
6
Hope it's nothin' serious. Mmmmm, golden hued chicken soup...
Posted by: Tuning Spork at October 16, 2004 06:30 PM (u/D1a)
7
i really hope your weekend has shaped up better. and that you are feeling yourself again.
Posted by: standing naked at October 17, 2004 04:00 PM (IAJcf)
8
I thought I was the only one who'd changed the lyrics to that?

Hope all goes well for you.
Posted by: Hannah at October 18, 2004 11:48 AM (7dELN)
9
If my husband read this he would be kissing your feet. I'll tell you why. He's working the ER right now and is inundated with patients who are primary care instead of real emergencies. In some cases they have just come from their doctor's office. Had they just given it a little extra effort, as you did, they would be paying the $60 average office cost instead of the several hundred dollar ER costs.
I'm assuming it IS infection? Hope the antibiotics kick in quickly! Happy, healthy thoughts heading your way.
Posted by: Linda at October 18, 2004 01:15 PM (9Pzdi)
10
Random, you may or may not be happy to know that I'm so susceptible to the power of suggestion that now after reading your blog, the entire left side of my throat AND my left ear is killing me when I swallow in sympathy for your plight.
So I share your pain. Well, at least I think I do. For now.
;-)
GET BETTER SOON! {{{hugs}}}
Amber, the hypochrondriac
Posted by: Amber at October 18, 2004 04:28 PM (zQE5D)
11
Can't you outsource the work to some of those poor Chinese peasants? That's a win-win...
Hope you're felling better.
Posted by: Simon at October 19, 2004 02:14 AM (UKqGy)
12
Oh my. Four days. This must be a bad one!
My sympathies, indeed.

Send up a flare, kiddo. You are missed!
Posted by: Margi at October 19, 2004 05:03 AM (MAdsZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 14, 2004
Goodbye, Lisa
I was on the train coming back from Philly late yesterday afternoon when my office called me on my cell to tell me that I had received a phone call from an unnamed woman who wanted me to know that my friend Lisa had succumbed to breast cancer the day before and was going to be buried that day. Jews bury their dead within 24 hours, you know. It was a foul up from my office that I only got the message so late, but it didn't matter, I was not able to go anyway. I shut my phone off and tried to think about what I was going to say to her husband or her two young children. This is what I've decided to do. I'm going to send her husband a codolence card but I'm also going to send her kids a letter telling them what kind of special woman their mother was. I hope that by doing that, I can help her kids when they get older and their memories of her have dimmed.
I'm very sad today. Lisa was a remarkable woman.
Lisa. October 12, 2004.
The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation will get money to those who can spend it best. I'm just saying.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
11:02 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 214 words, total size 1 kb.
1
rp,
i am sorry to hear about your friend.
thoughts are with her family and children.
i think the idea of a letter to them...is very thoughtful...and something that will be very appreciated by them as they go through life.
Posted by: standing naked at October 14, 2004 02:10 PM (04nGx)
2
RP,
I'm so sorry for your loss. I agree with SN that a letter to the children is an absolutely lovely idea. GQ
Posted by: grammarqueen at October 14, 2004 04:36 PM (gDEwS)
3
My condolences to the family. I am sorry for the loss of your friend RP. I do think the letter sounds like a good idea. How old are the children? To have a keepsake like that is very important.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at October 14, 2004 05:12 PM (kBaDF)
4
Wishing a long life to all.
Posted by: Simon at October 15, 2004 04:13 AM (OyeEA)
5
Random, so sorry to hear about your friend. I hope the best for her family.
I think the letter is a wonderful idea!
Posted by: Mick at October 15, 2004 11:52 AM (VhRca)
6
So very very sorry, Random.
An aquaintance of ours lost his young wife in a horrific car accident just a few months ago. Another driver had a stroke while driving a few blocks away and ended up flooring her car through the intersection, hitting our friend's wife's car who was sitting innocently at the light at about 90 miles an hour. She has left a grieving husband and two small children behind. He was in shock for a long time, of course.
Well, actually...we all were. :-(
{{{{hugs}}}}
Posted by: Amber at October 15, 2004 02:16 PM (zQE5D)
7
Very sorry for you loss RP.
My wife had a very close friend of the family die of ovarian cancer a few years back, it was tough. She has some mementos to remind her, and they are very precious.
Posted by: Oorgo at October 15, 2004 04:08 PM (lM0qs)
8
RP,
Sorry to hear about that. Great idea, though, on the letter. That is one of the coolest things I've heard in quite a while.
Posted by: Howard at October 16, 2004 10:46 AM (yYgvX)
9
Sad sad news, RP, my condolences to all who knew Lisa -- especially the kids.
Great idea on the letter.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at October 16, 2004 07:26 PM (u/D1a)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Comments Replies!
Hi, all, thanks so much for all the great comments over the last week and I'm sorry if I was not as responsive as I'd like to have been. So, let me address some of the comments here, in a post:
First, thanks to all sending me good wishes on feeling better. It hasn't worked at all, of course, but I appreciate it. I think putting in a 15 hour day yesterday was not conducive to feeling better. I actually feel a lot worse. The Boy Child was not helpful in getting up crying at 2:45 this morning. I jumped out of bed to get him so as to leave my wife undisturbed since she has a job interview this morning. He just wanted to be picked up for, tops, 30 seconds. Then I put him back in his crib, at his insistence, rubbed his back for another couple of seconds, and he was back asleep. It took me a lot longer. Good thing for him that he's so cute.
Second, as for soup. Rachel Anne, you could make it with any good vegetable broth and then you don't have to skimp on the all important dairy. Phillipe, when I have a sore throat or am congested, I want as much spice as I can stand. It makes my throat feel better, oddly, and it helps me breathe. Simon, other than poaching chicken breasts, it is really hard to make a good quality home made chicken soup during the week. I'd have needed to have been home for hours for that. See, I take kosher chicken legs and simmer them with celery, carrots, onions, leeks, parsley, etc. for a long time. I remove the chicken and strain the broth, throwing out the useless vegetables. Then, I add to the broth, more aromatics (carrots, etc.) and cook them while I shred the meat from the legs. I add the meat back in at the end, et voila, chicken soup. But it ain't a weekday kind of thing to make. And I usually make a whacking big vat of it so I can freeze some.
Third, as for D.C. Next time I'm down there, I will certainly give Ivan and Wicked some advance notice and perhaps they can show me a more hospitable bar. Margi, I'm glad you liked the toast. Mick, thanks for your good wishes. Mark, thanks for the recommendation about Clyde's!
Finally, Jim, thanks for the gentle nudge. I have actually been working on another "behind the curtain" post but have not had enough time to finish it up. Maybe soon, I promise!
By the way, if your comment went unaddressed above (Amber, Helen, etc.), please know that I am not ignoring you. The commnents part of the blog is really the best part and I appreciate all of them.
Thanks again, y'all!
Posted by: Random Penseur at
10:26 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 478 words, total size 3 kb.
1
The story about the boy waking up at 2:45 is familiar, and mine is the same, he usually just wants to be held for a few minutes. Just don't make the mistake of putting him down before his time, at least my guy anyways, his cry doubles in volume and lasts much longer. Such a temper.
Posted by: Oorgo at October 15, 2004 03:48 PM (lM0qs)
2
WOW! I'll add your site to my bookmarks.
Posted by: EroComix at July 18, 2005 08:03 PM (rPEvV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Change the Rhetoric, Please
This has been bugging me for a long time and I thought I'd drop a little line about it. I am tired of the use of combat rhetoric by sports writers, athletes, and owners. So, I request here, as follows:
*Stop using the word "war" to describe a sporting event, unless the sporting event is figure skating 'cause they actually come the closest, what with the use of hit men and all;
*Stop describing men who travel with their own chefs and massage therapists as "warriors", they are not. They are paid obscene amounts of money to whack balls or put on pads and hit each other. They are NOT warriors. The closest thing to a warrior, other than a service man or woman, is (usually) the woman left at home who holds a family together under stresses you and I cannot conceive of. These woman deserve our respect. Athletes are not warriors.
*Stop using the word "battle" or "battle tested" to describe a football player. Sports Illustrated described some LSU grad as "battle tested" because he played for the Tigers. The closest he has come to battle was the co-ed who probably successfully (this is Louisiana, after all) fought him off. He may have developed great athletic ability and tremendous powers of focus and concentration, but he is not a battle tested anything. He is the most coddled of creatures, a big time college football player.
There are other examples, I'm certain, but these are the ones which come to mind and piss me off the most of late.
Here endeth this morning's rant.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:11 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 273 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'm right with you on this one, Random. These hallowed terms that once inspired awe and respect, have lost their lustre by being used and abused in sportstalk. Call a game a game, not a battle. Nobody's life hangs in the balance over a football game. At least I hope not!
Posted by: Mick at October 14, 2004 10:27 AM (VhRca)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 13, 2004
Forecast: No Blogging Today
I'm off in a couple of minutes to catch the 7:30 train to Philly where I will spend the day reviewing 30 boxes of documents. I anticipate no access to computers.
I'd rather be blogging!
Posted by: Random Penseur at
06:40 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
1
rp,
i hope you are feeling better.
and that task does not sound like all that much fun...
yes - we would also rather you be blogging.
Posted by: standing naked at October 13, 2004 09:20 PM (IAJcf)
2
Are you feeling better? Did the soup help? It sounded delicious!
Good luck with the documents
Posted by: Elizabeth at October 13, 2004 10:31 PM (sCupo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
106kb generated in CPU 0.0301, elapsed 0.0426 seconds.
40 queries taking 0.0221 seconds, 168 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.