May 30, 2005
Memorial Day Photographs, II
Here is one image I think particularly haunting from the Korean War Memorial:

From the World War II Memorial:

A flower, placed in the hand of a dying soldier, part of the Vietnam Memorial:

And finally, looking towards Lincoln:
Posted by: Random Penseur at
01:32 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yes, the Korean War memorial is pretty haunting. Thank you for these photos, RP.
I couldn't think up a Memorial Day post, but you just gave me an idea...
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 30, 2005 05:47 PM (DU4ka)
2
Nice photos RP,
I used to jog on the mall in the early morning hours. On those days when there was an early morning fog/mist the Korean War Memorial would be positively eerie because as the fog began to burn off it would look as if the soldiers are marching out of the mist and off to the front lines.
Posted by: ivan at May 30, 2005 08:59 PM (Nny4f)
3
When we were on our trip to Greece, one of the few spots that really struck me was a WWII cemetery of fallen Allied soldiers from early on in the war. This epitaph was on the headstone of a British soldier, and was dedicated by what I assume was his best beloeved. I have meant to email this to you for a while, because it struck me as something that you would have been struck by. I know I couldn't help but weep at this epitaph, because it touches upon so many aspects of that war:
"The bravest are the tenderest,
The loving are the caring.
Annie"
Posted by: Mandalei at June 01, 2005 10:20 AM (LcyhB)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Memorial Day Photograps, I
A photo of the gold stars at the World War II Memorial:

Each gold star represents 1000 war dead.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
10:00 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I can see it's been awhile since I've been to W. DC. Some great photos. The one that really got me was the WWII Memorial. Each star represents 1000 lives lost?! Wow! And it took how long to get a Memorial?! Lest we never forget, ever, those who gave their lives. And why isn't there a National Police and Fireman Memorial?
Posted by: Dr Pants at June 01, 2005 03:11 AM (PHXL1)
2
I looked at the picture and thought: "Wow, that's a lot of soldiers, if each star represents one soldier. Wow..."
Then I looked at your text. Each star represents a THOUSAND soldiers.
...
Posted by: Hannah at June 01, 2005 12:36 PM (O6LLZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 27, 2005
Decoration Day
This weekend will mark another "Decoration Day", or Memorial Day, as is has come to be called. I kind of prefer Decoration Day, myself. It was a day when people would gather together and decorate the graves of the dead soldiers (and I include sailors, air men, marines and coast guard here whenever I use the word soldier, ok) and remember.
Do we still remember? Do we remember the words on the Korean War Memorial in Washington D.C. that:
FREEDOM IS NOT FREE
Men and women have died for our freedom and die today to ensure freedom for others. For this, if for no other reason, and there are plenty of good other reasons, I will pause this weekend, and I will remember.
May God bless all of our fellow Americans who this day wear our nation's uniforms.
And for those who did not come home, I want to leave you with some of the words from Taps (there are no official words), composed By Major General Daniel Butterfield, Army of the Potomac, Civil War, July 1862:
Day is done, gone the sun,
From the hills, from the lake,
From the sky.
All is well, safely rest,
God is nigh.
For information about Taps.
Posted by: Random Penseur at
11:31 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 208 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Very good of you to remind us that this is not just a day to open up pools, frolic and miss a work day.
God bless them ALL.
Posted by: Wicked H at May 27, 2005 01:40 PM (iqFar)
2
Here. Here.
I shall not get political today. I have erased most of what I wrote here.
Posted by: dr pants at May 28, 2005 03:59 AM (PHXL1)
3
I have to wear sunglasses to our town's Memorial Day observance because Taps makes me cry. I was covering our school's observance yesterday for our local paper and it was inside so I couldn't wear sunglasses, ugh! Thanks for the remembrance and the Taps link.
Posted by: Amy at May 28, 2005 08:51 AM (nUCsP)
4
Thanks for the eloquent reminder. Much needed in today's world, which is blatantly shameful, considering.
Posted by: Jennifer at May 28, 2005 12:05 PM (MbhV6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 04, 2005
It's all in the way you tell it
So, there I was, sweating away this morning in the gym and half-listening to CNN when they did a really interesting interview with an automotive industry analyst who was brought on to talk about the stark drop off in sales at General Motors. She was quite good, actually, explaining that what has the Street so freaked out is that the drop in sales was mostly in the SUV market, where GM makes all their money. If Americans are not buying the big Suburbans than GM ain't making no money, Well, she said it better. Then she was asked about whether union deals were hurting GM and whether GM was really spending too much on healthcare.
And this is where it got interesting for me. The analyst said that $1200 out of every car sold is used to pay for health care costs. Ok, well, that seems like a lot but I have no way of knowing. How do I put that in context? How many workers does that $1200 pay for? How many retirees? How many families? In short, how many people are covered by that?
Well, she went on to put in context for me. And this is what I mean when I say that it's all in the way you tell it, all in the way you present information. Telling me $1200 per car really tells me nothing. But tell me:
General Motors spent more on health care last year than they did on steel
and you've smacked me upside the head and caught my attention. She felt that for a manufacturing company, this wasn't very good.
Can you imagine that? Is GM a manufacturing company or a social welfare state? Let's see if we can figure that out a little.
GM, according to their annual report for 2004, had net sales and revenue of $193.5 billion. GM seems to divide themselves into auto making and finance/insurance divisions for revenue purposes. That's our first hint that GM may not be just a manufacturing company -- they have a f/i division big enough to warrant a separate discussion in the annual report. Automotive still is the biggest, earning $161.5 billion of the $193.5 and f/i earning some $32 billion. But I do note that only f/i earned a profit -- some $2.9 billion. Unfortunately, I lack the time to probe further and I cannot seem to isolate how much GM spent on steel last year or even what the costs were associated with the automotive divisions. Not a shock, really, when you're dealing with a company that size.
But still, more on health care than on steel. Stunning, isn't it?
Posted by: Random Penseur at
09:27 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 457 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Have you read Ayn Rand's
Atlas Shrugged? Remember Twentieth Century Motors in the book?
If you haven't read it or don't remember the scene, don't worry, I'll post some relevant quotes tonight or tomorrow.
Posted by: JohnL at May 04, 2005 03:03 PM (Hs4rn)
2
Forbes has been doing some decent reporting on this story for quite a while.
Go here and peruse. It's horrible. The UAW is really cleaning their clock and so far they're acknowledging that there is a problem, but they're not willing to back down a bit on their demands. Which really isn't going to do them any good if GM goes under. If you're interested, Forbes has a whole slew of articles about this story. Check out Jerry Flint---he's a former auto industry exec and he has a regular column. He's been banging on about GM for years now, and a lot of his predictions have come true.
One of my brothers owns several GM dealerships out in Montana and while he is the ultimate GM guy, even he will admit they drive him round the bend sometimes with their demands. The whole Oldsmobile phase-out was so poorly handled and was a major headache for him. GM tells the world that they're not going to sell Oldsmobiles after a certain date, and they will keep the dealerships open until such and such a date. The problem with this scenario is that people stopped buying them altogether once the news hit, thinking that they're not going to be serviced/parts won't be available. Then they screwed over the dealers by forcing them to keep their Olds dealerships open after this news has hit the market, thinking that sales incentives would be enough to move these beasts. Oy. The brother had to sue GM to get a fair buyout on his dealership, and he was successful, but plenty of other dealers weren't.
Posted by: Kathy at May 04, 2005 03:07 PM (cTptB)
3
And one other interesting fact: the brother will tell you flat out that he doesn't make dime one selling cars. He makes all of his money on after-market products, service and, you guessed it, f and i. In fact, the majority of it is from selling GM branded f and i products.
So, if $1200 of every SUV that's sold goes toward health care costs, and practically none of it goes toward the dealer, where's the rest of the money going? I don't know if that makes any sense whatsoever---being the girl who doesn't have a MBA or even a lousy business degree---but it tells me that costs are out of control at GM and that health care costs aren't their only problem. If I were a conspiracy theory sort of girl, I would say that this is just the first whack GM is going to take at the UAW in a long series of whacks to try and cut costs. We'll have to see if I'm right.
Posted by: Kathy at May 04, 2005 03:14 PM (cTptB)
4
Can I read an annual report, or what? I just got suspicious when she described them as a manufacturing company, so I went and checked them out. f/i was the only place they made money.
As for conspiracy, maybe. Don't forget that SUV sales really are down and that is the profit center for the auto div. They may seize on that fact to press the unions, but it is a fact and they have to figure out how to sell cars the people want to buy. Or else they're really just a bank.
Thanks for the great comments, Kath!
Posted by: RP at May 04, 2005 04:00 PM (LlPKh)
5
Here's a stat to answer Kathy's "where's the money going question". I'm sure you'll find this interesting.
"The Lincoln Navigator makes around $20,000 profit per vehicle even though it isn't much more expensive to build than a lower-priced Ford Explorer or F-Series pickup, who it shares architecture and components with." - Forbes Magazine.
I seriously doubt that the $1,200 health care cost per vehicle they're sharing with the public is cutting into their profits or into their price of steel.
It's all in how they leverage and present the numbers to the public in order to achieve their aim. Great post! Welcome back!
Posted by: Michele at May 10, 2005 12:44 PM (ht2RK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
27kb generated in CPU 0.0436, elapsed 0.0507 seconds.
24 queries taking 0.044 seconds, 50 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.